{"id":10059,"date":"2022-03-07T12:23:53","date_gmt":"2022-03-07T10:23:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apador.org\/?p=10059"},"modified":"2022-03-07T12:23:53","modified_gmt":"2022-03-07T10:23:53","slug":"cele-doua-adevaruri-despre-neconstitutionalitatea-mastii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/cele-doua-adevaruri-despre-neconstitutionalitatea-mastii\/","title":{"rendered":"Cele dou\u0103 adev\u0103ruri despre (ne)constitu\u021bionalitatea m\u0103\u0219tii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10059\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>CCR a declarat neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 ordonan\u021ba care instituia obligativitatea m\u0103\u0219tii, pe motiv c\u0103 Guvernul nu a cerut avizul Consiliului Legislativ pentru ea; SGG ne arat\u0103 avizul \u0219i sus\u021bine c\u0103 adoptarea ordonan\u021bei s-a f\u0103cut legal; Cum pot coexista dou\u0103 adev\u0103ruri antagonice despre aceea\u0219i realitate?<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dup\u0103 ce Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a declarat neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 Ordonan\u021ba de Urgen\u021b\u0103 192\/2020, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Comunicat-de-presa-15-februarie-2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pe motiv<\/a> c\u0103 la adoptarea ei nu a fost cerut avizul Consiliului Legislativ, <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/pe-cine-din-guvern-tragem-la-raspundere-pentru-neconstitutionalitatea-mastii\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">APADOR-CH i-a cerut<\/a> premierului Ciuc\u0103 o anchet\u0103 pentru a vedea cine din Guvern se face vinovat de aceast\u0103 sc\u0103pare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Nu am primit un r\u0103spuns imediat, ci mai degrab\u0103 prin rico\u0219eu: CSM a luat comunicatul nostru de pres\u0103 \u0219i l-a direc\u021bionat c\u0103tre SGG, cer\u00e2nd s\u0103 ni se transmit\u0103 un r\u0103spuns. O manier\u0103 interesant\u0103 de a comunica cu executivul, dar care iat\u0103 c\u0103 s-a soldat cu un r\u0103spuns.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ca la Radio Erevan, <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/raspuns-sgg-masca-neconst.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Secretariatul General al Guvernului ne spune<\/a> nu numai c\u0103 a cerut avizul Consiliului Legsilativ pentru OUG 192\/2020, dar c\u0103 l-a \u0219i primit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Este amintit \u00een r\u0103spuns c\u0103 \u0219edin\u021ba de guvern \u00een care a fost adoptat\u0103 respectiva ordonan\u021b\u0103 a \u00eenceput <strong>pe 5 noiembrie<\/strong> la ora 19.05 \u0219i s-a \u00eencheiat t\u00e2rziu \u00een noapte, dup\u0103 ora 2.00, c\u00e2nd deja <strong>era 6 noiembrie<\/strong>, \u0219i c\u0103 Ordonan\u021ba 192 a fost introdus\u0103 suplimentar pe ordinea de zi. SGG spune c\u0103 <strong>a cerut avizul Consiliului Legislativ pe 6 noiembrie \u0219i l-a \u0219i primit \u00een aceea\u0219i zi<\/strong>, <strong>cel mai probabil dup\u0103 adoptarea ordonan\u021bei<\/strong>, c\u0103ci e greu de presupus c\u0103 domnul Toni Grebl\u0103, care semneaz\u0103 avizul, a lucrat \u00een schimbul trei, \u00een noaptea dintre 5 \u0219i 6 noiembrie, pentru asta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tehnic vorbind, a\u0219adar SGG a \u0219i solicitat \u0219i a \u0219i primit avizul Consiliului Legislativ, pentru Ordonan\u021ba de Urgen\u021b\u0103 192\/2020. Numai c\u0103 nu pe 5 c\u00e2nd a \u00eenceput \u0219edin\u021ba de guvern, ci pe 6, dup\u0103 ce ordonan\u021ba a fost deja adoptat\u0103. A\u0219a se face c\u0103 OUG 192\/2020 apare <a href=\"https:\/\/legislatie.just.ro\/Public\/DetaliiDocumentAfis\/232731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">adoptat\u0103 cu data de 5 noiembrie<\/a>, publicat\u0103 \u00een Monitorul oficial pe 6 noiembrie.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dac\u0103 SGG ar fi fost un chirurg, ne-ar fi spus c\u0103 a \u00eenceput opera\u021bia \u00een seara de 5 noiembrie, dar i-a f\u0103cut anestezia pacientului abia la final, pe 6, c\u00e2nd a venit \u0219i anestezistul la lucru.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">R\u0103m\u00e2ne s\u0103 vedem motivarea CCR, din care vom afla, cel mai probabil, c\u0103 judec\u0103torii nu s-au l\u0103sat impresiona\u021bi de avizul Consiliului Legsilativ ob\u021binut post factum. Altfel CCR nu ar fi scris \u00een comunicatul de pres\u0103 emis dup\u0103 anun\u021barea neconstitu\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii ordonan\u021bei: \u201e<em>Curtea a constatat neconstitu\u021bionalitatea \u00een ansamblu a Ordonan\u021bei de urgen\u021b\u0103 a Guvernului nr.192\/2020 <strong>\u00eentruc\u00e2t a fost adoptat\u0103 cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor constitu\u021bionale ale art.1 alin.(3) \u0219i (5) \u0219i art.79 alin.(1), referitoare la avizarea proiectelor de acte normative de c\u0103tre Consiliul Legislativ.<\/strong><\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00centre timp, \u00een spa\u021biul public au ap\u0103rut semnale c\u0103 ANAF \u00eei execut\u0103 silit pe cet\u0103\u021benii amenda\u021bi \u00een baza OUG 192\/2020, pentru nepurtarea m\u0103\u0219tii. Asta pentru c\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 c\u00e2nd CCR nu public\u0103 \u0219i motivarea deciziei luate \u00een 15 februarie, efectele OUG 192\/2020 \u00eenc\u0103 se produc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Opinia APADOR-CH este c\u0103 executarea silit\u0103 ar trebui contestat\u0103 la instan\u021b\u0103 de fiecare persoan\u0103 vizat\u0103, pe motiv c\u0103 executarea silit\u0103 nu poate privi o amend\u0103 aplicat\u0103 \u00een baza unui text legal declarat neconstitu\u021bional. Chiar dac\u0103 decizia CCR nu este \u00eenc\u0103 publicat\u0103, toat\u0103 lumea &#8211; deci \u0219i instan\u021bele &#8211; cunoa\u0219te ce a decis CCR. Nu putem garanta succes absolut, justi\u021bia mai are \u00eenca o doz\u0103 de imprevizil, dar ar trebui \u00eencercat.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10059\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n<p>CCR a declarat neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 ordonan\u021ba care instituia obligativitatea m\u0103\u0219tii, pe motiv c\u0103 Guvernul nu a cerut avizul Consiliului Legislativ pentru ea; SGG ne arat\u0103 avizul \u0219i sus\u021bine c\u0103 adoptarea ordonan\u021bei s-a f\u0103cut legal; Cum pot coexista dou\u0103 adev\u0103ruri antagonice despre aceea\u0219i realitate?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4521,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1026,1022],"tags":[1501,1493,1494],"class_list":["post-10059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articole","category-articole-reportaje","tag-masca-neconstitutionala","tag-ordonanta-neconstitutionala","tag-oug-nr-192-2020"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10059"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10059\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10063,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10059\/revisions\/10063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}