{"id":10575,"date":"2023-02-21T08:39:07","date_gmt":"2023-02-21T06:39:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apador.org\/?p=10575"},"modified":"2023-02-20T19:02:22","modified_gmt":"2023-02-20T17:02:22","slug":"guvernele-au-continuat-sa-sape-la-temelia-democratiei-si-in-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/guvernele-au-continuat-sa-sape-la-temelia-democratiei-si-in-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Guvernele au continuat s\u0103 sape la temelia democra\u021biei \u0219i \u00een 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10575\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Doi ani de pandemie \u0219i unul de r\u0103zboi, guvernele din unele \u021b\u0103ri UE au continuat s\u0103 submineze statul de drept, inclusiv \u00een Rom\u00e2nia, arat\u0103 Raportul Liberties 2023, la care a contribuit \u0219i APADOR-CH<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Berlin-Brussels-Bucure\u0219ti 21.02.2023<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-10578\" src=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania-211x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"211\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania-211x300.jpg 211w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania-725x1030.jpg 725w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania-768x1091.jpg 768w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania-496x705.jpg 496w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/romania.jpg 791w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 211px) 100vw, 211px\" \/>Majoritatea \u021b\u0103rilor UE au f\u0103cut pu\u021bine eforturi pentru a rezolva problemele privind statul de drept, au permis ca deficien\u021bele existente \u00een anii anteriori s\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 nerezolvate \u0219i \u00een 2022 sau chiar au \u00eenr\u0103ut\u0103\u021bit lucrurile \u00een domeniile evaluate. Aceasta este concluzia celui mai recent Raport Liberties privind statul de drept, un audit ce reune\u0219te informa\u021bii transmise de 45 de organiza\u021bii neguvernamentale din 18 \u021b\u0103ri, \u0219i care a fost transmis Comisiei Europene, \u00een cadrul exerci\u021biului de consultare public\u0103 2023, privind statul de drept \u00een 2022.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Raportul Liberties prezint\u0103 cele mai importante evolu\u021bii \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te justi\u021bia, corup\u021bia, libertatea presei, spa\u021biul civic \u0219i problemele sistemice ale drepturilor omului \u00een 2022, realizat de o re\u021bea independent\u0103 de organiza\u021bii de libert\u0103\u021bi civile din UE. APADOR-CH este membr\u0103 Liberties \u0219i a contribuit \u0219i \u00een acest an la raport cu o serie de informa\u021bii cheie privind evolu\u021bia statului de drept \u00een Rom\u00e2nia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Printre acestea se afl\u0103:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Aspecte problematice cuprinse \u00een legile justi\u021biei, cum ar fi nesanc\u021bionarea magistra\u021bilor pentru nerespectarea deciziilor CCR sau ICCJ sau complicatul mecanism de r\u0103spundere financiar\u0103 a acestora pentru daunele cauzate de erori judiciare;<\/li>\n<li>Percep\u021bia publicului asupra independen\u021bei justi\u021biei \u0219i asupra Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, \u00een urma deciziei acesteia referitoare la \u00eentreruperea prescrip\u021biei, decizie care a aruncat \u00een aer dosare mari de corup\u021bie ale unor politicieni;<\/li>\n<li>Sabotarea luptei anticorup\u021bie prin transpunerea minimal\u0103 a Directivei europene privind protec\u021bia avertizorilor de integritate \u00eentr-o lege adoptat\u0103 cu greu de Parlament, \u00een decembrie 2022;<\/li>\n<li>Subminarea rolului presei \u00eentr-o democra\u021bie, prin finan\u021barea masiv\u0103 a presei mainstream, de c\u0103tre partidul unic (coali\u021bia st\u00e2nga-dreapta aflat\u0103 la guvernare), cu bani din subven\u021biile bugetare. La asta se adaug\u0103 intimidarea jurnali\u0219tilor de investiga\u021bie independen\u021bi, prin metode de compromitere care au implicat institu\u021bii ale statului;<\/li>\n<li>Limitarea libert\u0103\u021bii de exprimare prin adoptarea unei legi privind securitatea cibernetic\u0103, prin care o opinie contrar\u0103 celei oficiale a statului ar putea fi considerat\u0103 atingere adus\u0103 securit\u0103\u021bii na\u021bionale \u0219i chiar incriminat\u0103 ca infrac\u021biune;<\/li>\n<li>Restric\u021bionarea accesului la justi\u021bie prin proiecte de legi care \u00eencearc\u0103 s\u0103 \u00eempiedice ONG-urile s\u0103 conteste \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 acte administrative problematice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/statul-de-drept-in-romania-guvernul-a-sabotat-democratia-si-in-2022\/\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#ffffff;background-color:#dd0224;border-color:#b1021d;border-radius:7px\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color:#ffffff;padding:7px 20px;font-size:16px;line-height:24px;border-color:#e84e66;border-radius:7px;text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-hand-o-right\" style=\"font-size:16px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Citi\u021bi pe larg contribu\u021bia APADOR-CH la raport \u00een limba rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/span><\/a>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/RuleOfLaw_Report_2023_Romania.pdf\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#ffffff;background-color:#5bbaf1;border-color:#4995c1;border-radius:7px\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color:#ffffff;padding:7px 20px;font-size:16px;line-height:24px;border-color:#8dcff6;border-radius:7px;text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-hand-o-right\" style=\"font-size:16px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Read APADOR-CH contribution<\/span><\/a>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Pe scurt din Raportul Liberties, privind alte state:<\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>DEVIA\u021aII: UNGARIA \u0219i POLONIA<\/strong> r\u0103m\u00e2n cele mai mari infractoare ale statului de drept. De\u0219i UE \u0219i-a declan\u0219at mecanismul de condi\u021bionare a fondurilor, pentru Ungaria, acest lucru nu a produs \u00eenc\u0103 \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021biri reale pe teren. Similar, reformele negociate cu Polonia, \u00een schimbul eliber\u0103rii fondurilor UE pentru COVID, ar duce doar la \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021biri modeste, care nu elibereaz\u0103 judec\u0103torii de controlul politic. Aceste guverne continu\u0103 s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een aplicare o serie de m\u0103suri menite s\u0103 centralizeze puterea, s\u0103-\u0219i reduc\u0103 la t\u0103cere opozan\u021bii, s\u0103 controleze opinia public\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 fac\u0103 foarte dificil\u0103 pierderea viitoarelor alegeri;<\/li>\n<li><strong>\u00ceNV\u0102\u021a\u0102CEI: ITALIA \u0219i SUEDIA<\/strong>. Primele semne de la noile guverne formate \u00een Italia \u0219i Suedia \u00een 2022 indic\u0103 riscul ca, dac\u0103 mecanismele de control nu r\u0103m\u00e2n puternice, coali\u021biile de guvern\u0103m\u00e2nt s\u0103 se \u00eendrepte c\u0103tre autoritarism. De exemplu, s-a observat deja o cre\u0219tere brusc\u0103 a atacurilor retorice \u00eempotriva ONG-urilor \u0219i a mass-media din partea acestor dou\u0103 noi guverne. Cu toate acestea, aceste \u021b\u0103ri au institu\u021bii independente puternice, care, pe termen scurt, \u00eempiedic\u0103 o \u00eentoarcere c\u0103tre autoritarism la scara Ungariei \u0219i Poloniei;<\/li>\n<li><strong>RECUPERARE<\/strong>: \u00cen schimb, evolu\u021biile din <strong>Slovenia<\/strong>, de la \u00eenlocuirea guvernului de extrem\u0103 dreapta, arat\u0103 c\u0103 \u021b\u0103rile \u00ee\u0219i pot reabilita democra\u021biile. De exemplu, Raportul \u00eenregistreaz\u0103 eforturile de a restabili independen\u021ba unor institu\u021bii precum radioul public \u0219i de a revoca \u0219i rambursa amenzile care au fost emise ilegal \u00een timpul guvernului anterior de extrem\u0103 dreapta, cet\u0103\u021benilor, pentru c\u0103 au participat la proteste;<\/li>\n<li><strong>REZULTATE MIXTE<\/strong>: <strong>UE<\/strong>. \u00cen timp ce situa\u021bia din statele membre continu\u0103 \u00een direc\u021bia gre\u0219it\u0103, UE a avut succese mixte \u00een exercitarea unei influen\u021be pozitive. Pe fondul r\u0103zboiului Rusiei \u00eempotriva Ucrainei, UE a decis s\u0103 ia m\u0103suri mai ferme \u00eempotriva Ungariei (care s-a izolat politic prin sprijinirea Rusiei) dec\u00e2t a Poloniei (care a f\u0103cut tot posibilul s\u0103 sprijine Ucraina). \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, reac\u021bia UE la amenin\u021b\u0103rile emergente la adresa democra\u021biei a st\u00e2rnit \u00eengrijorare. De exemplu, interzicerea de c\u0103tre UE a Russia Today \u0219i Sputnik, ca o modalitate de combatere a dezinformarii sponsorizate de statul rus, a st\u00e2rnit \u00eengrijor\u0103ri serioase prin crearea unui precedent periculos. Iar dezv\u0103luirile \u0219ocante ale scandalului de corup\u021bie din Qatargate, care zguduie Parlamentul European, afecteaz\u0103 probabil credibilitatea \u0219i statutul moral al UE.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties_Rule_of_Law_Report_2023.pdf\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-default\" style=\"color:#ffffff;background-color:#5bbaf1;border-color:#4995c1;border-radius:7px\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"color:#ffffff;padding:7px 20px;font-size:16px;line-height:24px;border-color:#8dcff6;border-radius:7px;text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-hand-o-right\" style=\"font-size:16px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Citi\u021bi aici Raportul Liberties integral &#8211; eng<\/span><\/a>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Guvernele europene ar trebui s\u0103 realizeze c\u0103, nereu\u0219ind s\u0103-\u0219i hr\u0103neasc\u0103 democra\u021biile, ele deschid calea politicienilor extremi\u0219ti, care nu vor ezita s\u0103 d\u0103r\u00e2me \u00eentregul sistem. \u00cen ciuda faptului c\u0103 Bruxelles-ul \u0219i-a permis s\u0103 fie \u0219antajat, lu\u00e2nd doar jum\u0103t\u0103\u021bi de m\u0103suri, vrem s\u0103 vedem c\u0103 UE folose\u0219te pe deplin mecanismul de condi\u021bionare a fondurilor, at\u00e2t pentru regimul polonez, c\u00e2t \u0219i pentru cel maghiar. Atunci c\u00e2nd fondurile sunt suspendate, trebuie s\u0103 fie la un nivel care s\u0103 nu le dea lui Orban \u0219i lui Kaczynski alt\u0103 op\u021biune dec\u00e2t s\u0103 readuc\u0103 democra\u021bia pentru cet\u0103\u021benii lor, deoarece Polonia \u0219i Ungaria au nevoie de UE pentru a face fa\u021b\u0103 consecin\u021belor r\u0103zboiului Rusiei \u00een Ucraina\u201d, a declarat <strong>Balazs Denes<\/strong>, director executiv al Uniunii Libert\u0103\u021bilor Civile pentru Europa \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.liberties.eu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Liberties<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-10577\" src=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport-210x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"210\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport-210x300.jpg 210w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport-722x1030.jpg 722w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport-768x1095.jpg 768w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport-494x705.jpg 494w, https:\/\/apador.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Liberties-raport.jpg 786w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 210px) 100vw, 210px\" \/>Sinteza Raportului, pe capitole:<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>LIBERTATEA PRESEI<\/strong>: \u00cen multe \u021b\u0103ri, a devenit mai greu pentru jurnali\u0219ti s\u0103-\u0219i fac\u0103 treaba. Guvernele Poloniei \u0219i Ungariei au continuat s\u0103-\u0219i foloseasc\u0103 radiodifuzorii publici pentru a disemina propagand\u0103 iar \u00een Slovacia \u0219i Suedia independen\u021ba media fa\u021b\u0103 de guvern e \u00een pericol. \u00cen multe \u021b\u0103ri, un num\u0103r mic de proprietari continu\u0103 s\u0103 de\u021bin\u0103 majoritatea institu\u021biilor media private, permi\u021b\u00e2ndu-le s\u0103 influen\u021beze ceea ce aude publicul, de exemplu \u00een Italia, \u021a\u0103rile de Jos, Republica Ceh\u0103, Fran\u021ba \u0219i Slovenia. Jurnali\u015ftii care \u00eencercau s\u0103 raporteze despre corup\u0163ie s-au v\u0103zut h\u0103r\u0163ui\u0163i prin procese false (SLAPP), de exemplu \u00een Bulgaria, Croa\u0163ia, Ungaria, Italia, Olanda \u015fi Polonia. Iar reporterii au fost, de asemenea, ataca\u021bi verbal \u0219i fizic \u00een \u00eentreaga UE, de c\u0103tre public sau de c\u0103tre stat, de exemplu \u00een Bulgaria, Croa\u021bia, Republica Ceh\u0103, Estonia, Fran\u021ba, Ungaria, Germania, Irlanda, Italia, \u021a\u0103rile de Jos, Polonia, Rom\u00e2nia, Suedia \u0219i Spania. \u00centr-o evolu\u021bie pozitiv\u0103 remarcabil\u0103, noul guvern al Sloveniei a \u00eenceput o serie de reforme pentru a depolitiza mass-media din serviciul public \u0219i a-i restabili independen\u021ba dup\u0103 ce a fost preluat\u0103 de guvernul anterior de extrem\u0103 dreapta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>JUSTI\u021aIA<\/strong>: \u00cen 2022, multe instan\u021be nu \u0219i-au putut face treaba. De exemplu, \u00een Bulgaria, Republica Ceh\u0103, Germania, Ungaria, Polonia, Slovacia \u0219i Spania, s-au g\u0103sit politicieni care au un cuv\u00e2nt de spus \u00een alegerea, promovarea \u0219i disciplinarea judec\u0103torilor. Presiunea politic\u0103 asupra judec\u0103torilor a r\u0103mas puternic\u0103 \u00een Ungaria \u0219i Polonia, iar \u00een 2022 ace\u0219tia s-au confruntat \u0219i cu campanii de def\u0103imare. De asemenea, s-a constatat c\u0103 \u021b\u0103rile fac pu\u021bin pentru a facilita accesul oamenilor la justi\u021bie. De exemplu, guvernele nu acord\u0103 suficiente resurse sistemelor judiciare din Belgia, Croa\u021bia, Estonia, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Italia, Irlanda \u0219i Polonia. Asta \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 este nevoie de un timp nerezonabil de lung pentru a judeca un proces, deoarece, de exemplu, nu exist\u0103 finan\u021bare pentru a angaja suficien\u021bi judec\u0103tori.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>CORUP\u021aIA<\/strong>: Raportul arat\u0103 c\u0103 regulile \u0219i mecanismele create de multe guverne sunt prea slabe pentru a opri corup\u021bia. Corup\u021bia e profund\u0103 \u00een Ungaria, de\u0219i guvernul a f\u0103cut unele \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021biri superficiale pentru a asigura primirea fondurilor COVID \u0219i a fondurilor structurale. Dar multe \u021b\u0103ri se confrunt\u0103 cu probleme. De exemplu, \u00een Republica Ceh\u0103 \u0219i \u021a\u0103rile de Jos este foarte dificil pentru public s\u0103 afle cum decide guvernul s\u0103 \u00eencheie contracte, iar \u00een Fran\u021ba \u0219i Croa\u021bia guvernele au atribuit contracte alia\u021bilor de afaceri, \u00een timp ce \u00een Belgia \u0219i Irlanda, mecanismele pentru combaterea corup\u021biei nu au primit resursele de care au nevoie pentru a func\u021biona. De asemenea, multe \u021b\u0103ri nu au reu\u0219it s\u0103 ofere avertizorilor nivelul de protec\u021bie pe care \u00eel cere noua directiv\u0103 a UE, precum \u021a\u0103rile de Jos \u0219i Croa\u021bia, sau \u00eenc\u0103 nu au adoptat legisla\u021bie na\u021bional\u0103, precum Bulgaria, Republica Ceh\u0103, Estonia, Italia, Slovacia \u0219i Spania.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SPA\u021aIUL CIVIC<\/strong>: \u00cen 2022, multe guverne au \u00eengreunat via\u021ba organiza\u021biilor nonprofit. Un num\u0103r de \u021b\u0103ri au men\u021binut, introdus sau propus noi legi care fie au acordat guvernului puteri mai mari de a dizolva ONG-urile, fie au fost \u00een mod deliberat vagi cu privire la activit\u0103\u021bile care ar putea duce la \u00eenchiderea sau pierderea statutului lor de utilitate public\u0103, f\u0103c\u00e2nd ONG-urile mai pu\u021bin \u00eenclinate s\u0103 vorbeasc\u0103 despre subiecte pe care politicienii prefer\u0103 s\u0103 nu le discute. De exemplu, \u00een Republica Ceh\u0103, Fran\u021ba, Germania, \u021a\u0103rile de Jos \u0219i Spania. Au existat campanii de calomnie \u0219i h\u0103r\u021buire a ONG-urilor din Croa\u021bia, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Irlanda, Italia, Slovenia \u0219i Suedia. Mai ales \u00een privin\u021ba ONG-urilor care lucreaz\u0103 cu migran\u021bi sau pentru combaterea schimb\u0103rilor climatice. De asemenea, mai multe \u021b\u0103ri \u0219i-au folosit puterile pentru a restr\u00e2nge dreptul la protest, de exemplu \u00een Belgia, Estonia, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Italia, \u021a\u0103rile de Jos \u0219i Suedia. \u00cen unele cazuri, autorit\u0103\u021bile au ac\u021bionat pe baza competen\u021belor create pentru a face fa\u021b\u0103 pandemiei, care sunt \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een vigoare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>DREPTURILE OMULUI<\/strong>: Unele guverne continu\u0103 s\u0103 atace anumite grupuri din societate. Adesea, acesta este un instrument de a distrage aten\u021bia publicului de la propria incapacitate de a rezolva problemele, d\u00e2nd vina pe oricine, \u00een afar\u0103 de politicienii cu putere de decizie. \u00cen 2022 au existat atacuri retorice \u0219i, adesea, m\u0103suri restrictive \u0219i punitive \u00eempotriva persoanelor care migreaz\u0103 (\u00een Croa\u021bia, Estonia, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Ungaria, Italia, Irlanda, Lituania, Slovenia \u0219i Spania), a minorit\u0103\u021bilor etnice (Bulgaria, Fran\u021ba, Suedia) \u0219i a persoanelor LGBTQ (Republica Ceh\u0103, Ungaria, Irlanda \u0219i Slovacia).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>LEGIFERARE<\/strong>: Guvernele au abuzat \u00een ultimii ani \u0219i continu\u0103 s\u0103 abuzeze de procedurile accelerate de legiferare, ingor\u00e2nd obliga\u021bia legal\u0103 de consultare public\u0103. \u00cen mai multe \u021b\u0103ri, acesta este un efect r\u0103mas dup\u0103 pandemie, c\u00e2nd guvernele au accelerat procesul de creare a unor noi legi \u0219i politici, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t s\u0103 poat\u0103 reac\u021biona rapid pentru a proteja s\u0103n\u0103tatea public\u0103. \u00cen unele cazuri pare a fi o \u00eencercare deliberat\u0103 de a \u00eempiedica cet\u0103\u021benii s\u0103 \u00ee\u0219i spun\u0103 cuv\u00e2ntul. Astfel de probleme sunt \u00een Croa\u021bia, Cehia, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Irlanda, Ungaria, Rom\u00e2nia \u0219i Slovacia. \u00cen 2022, multe \u021b\u0103ri nu le-au oferit institu\u021biilor independen\u021ba, resursele sau puterile de care au nevoie pentru a-\u0219i face treaba, de exemplu, pentru a se asigura c\u0103 guvernele respect\u0103 regulile corecte atunci c\u00e2nd legifereaz\u0103. \u00cen Belgia, Bulgaria, Croa\u021bia, Republica Ceh\u0103, Fran\u021ba, Germania, Ungaria \u0219i Irlanda.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Despre Raportul Liberties<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Acest Raport anual privind statul de drept este al patrulea exerci\u021biu pe care Liberties \u00eel public\u0103, din 2019. Pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 reunirea rapoartelor individuale de \u021bar\u0103, elaborate de organiza\u021biile membre \u0219i partenere, Raportul include o prezentare a tendin\u021belor generale privind statul de drept \u00een UE, compilat\u0103 de Liberties. De asemenea, formuleaz\u0103 recomand\u0103ri detaliate adresate at\u00e2t guvernelor na\u021bionale, c\u00e2t \u0219i institu\u021biilor UE, cu privire la modul de abordare a deficien\u021belor identificate \u00een fiecare dintre domeniile acoperite \u0219i sugereaz\u0103 modul \u00een care Comisia European\u0103 ar putea \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021bi impactul exerci\u021biului s\u0103u de monitorizare.<\/li>\n<li>Fiind un \u201eraport din umbr\u0103\u201d, Raportul Liberties reflect\u0103 temele exacte ale raportului propriu al Comisiei Europene despre statul de drept: sistemul de justi\u021bie, media, probleme sistemice ale drepturilor omului, corup\u021bie \u0219i spa\u021biul civic. Nu toate organiza\u021biile care au contribuit la raport au colectat informa\u021bii despre toate domeniile acoperite de raport.<\/li>\n<li>Raportul 2023 include trimiteri din 18 state membre ale UE, din partea a <strong>45 de organiza\u021bii pentru drepturile omului<\/strong>, \u0219i anume:<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">League of Human Rights (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/ym19cz\">Belgium<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/pexpww\">Bulgaria<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Centre for Peace Studies (Croatia),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">League of Human Rights, Glopolis (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/7c0m8r\">Czech Republic<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Human Rights Center (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/fkxefk\">Estonia<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vox Public (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/cwcxi-\">France<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">the Society for Civil Rights, FragDenStaat, LobbyControl (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/c9ftfx\">Germany<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/llyy84\">Hungary<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, Irish Congress of Trade Unions, Trinity College Dublin School of Law, The Immigrant Council of Ireland, Inclusion Ireland, Intersex Ireland, Community Law and Mediation, Justice for Shane, Mercy Law Resource Centre, Irish Penal Reform Trust, The National Union of Journalists, Age Action Ireland, The Irish Network Against Racism, Outhouse, Irish Traveller Movement, Pavee Point, FLAC-Free Legal Advice Centres, Mental Health Reform (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/pxj-bl\">Ireland<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Antigone Association, Italian Coalition for Civil Liberties and Rights (CILD), A Buon Diritto Onlus, Association for Juridical Studies on Immigration or ASGI,Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT) (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/mhwtq1\">Italy<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Human Rights Monitoring Institute (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/bgpoql\">Lithuania<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Netherlands Helsinki Committee, Free Press Unlimited, Transparency International Nederlands (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/pkypcz\">Netherlands<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/cxcuhl\">Poland<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">APADOR-CH (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/lo6dmk\">Romania<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Via Iuris (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/h4j5hd\">Slovakia<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Peace Institute (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/_3as1s\">Slovenia<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rights International Spain (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/h9xggu\">Spain<\/a>),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Civil Rights Defenders, International Commission of Jurists (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.liberties.eu\/f\/ysqhhs\">Sweden<\/a>).<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Despre APADOR-CH<\/strong> &#8211; Asocia\u021bia pentru Ap\u0103rarea Drepturilor Omului \u00een Rom\u00e2nia \u2013 Comitetul Helsinki (APADOR-CH) este o organiza\u021bie neguvernamental\u0103, non-profit, \u00eenfiin\u021bat\u0103 \u00een 1990, care\u00a0ac\u0163ioneaz\u0103 pentru protec\u0163ia drepturilor omului \u015fi pentru stabilirea echilibrului atunci c\u00e2nd acestea sunt \u00een pericol sau sunt \u00eenc\u0103lcate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Despre Liberties<\/strong> &#8211; Uniunea Libert\u0103\u021bilor Civile pentru Europa (Liberties) este un grup de organiza\u021bii civile cu sediul la Berlin, av\u00e2nd 19 ONG-uri membre din \u00eentreaga UE. Liberties desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 campanii pe probleme legate de drepturile omului \u0219i drepturi digitale, statul de drept, libertatea presei (inclusiv SLAPP), confiden\u021bialitatea, publicitatea direc\u021bionat\u0103, AI, supraveghere \u0219i multe altele.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Contact media:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Valentin Toth<\/strong>, Responsabil Comunicare Liberties, +4915734590281 (Signal, Whatsapp)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"mailto:valentin.toth@liberties.eu\">valentin.toth@liberties.eu<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.liberties.eu\">www.liberties.eu<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10575\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n<p>Doi ani de pandemie \u0219i unul de r\u0103zboi, guvernele din unele \u021b\u0103ri UE au continuat s\u0103 submineze statul de drept, inclusiv \u00een Rom\u00e2nia, arat\u0103 Raportul Liberties 2023, la care a contribuit \u0219i APADOR-CH<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10585,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[41,117,1368,1491,243],"class_list":["post-10575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comunicate","tag-apador-ch","tag-justitie","tag-liberties-report","tag-raport-stat-de-drept-2022","tag-stat-de-drept"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10575"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10575\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10586,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10575\/revisions\/10586"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}