{"id":11862,"date":"2026-02-05T13:53:13","date_gmt":"2026-02-05T11:53:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/apador.org\/?p=11862"},"modified":"2026-03-25T09:25:55","modified_gmt":"2026-03-25T07:25:55","slug":"de-ce-judecatorii-n-au-voie-sa-fie-avertizori-de-integritate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/de-ce-judecatorii-n-au-voie-sa-fie-avertizori-de-integritate\/","title":{"rendered":"De ce judec\u0103torii n-au voie s\u0103 fie avertizori de integritate?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Conform CSM, un judec\u0103tor care semnaleaz\u0103 o ilegalitate NU e protejat de Legea avertizorilor; APADOR-CH cere modificarea legii<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii (CSM) a r\u0103spuns recent la o solicitare de informa\u021bii, transmis\u0103 de APADOR-CH, privind aplicarea Legii avertizorilor \u00een interes public (Legea 361\/2022) \u00een sistemul judiciar. R\u0103spunsul este problematic<\/a>:\u00a0CSM consider\u0103 c\u0103 legea nu s-ar aplica judec\u0103torilor<\/strong>, pentru c\u0103 ace\u0219tia nu sunt viza\u021bi de textul legii.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Aceast\u0103 interpretare, bazat\u0103 pe o analiz\u0103 intern\u0103 \u0219i pe o decizie a \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie (182\/2024),\u00a0exclude din protec\u021bia legal\u0103 orice judec\u0103tor care ar denun\u021ba o neregul\u0103 \u00een cadrul instan\u021bei \u00een care lucreaz\u0103<\/strong>, chiar dac\u0103 aceasta afecteaz\u0103 drepturile cet\u0103\u021benilor sau integritatea justi\u021biei.<\/p>\n

Ce spune CSM?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

CSM nu a luat o decizie oficial\u0103 a Plenului sau a Sec\u021biei de Judec\u0103tori \u00een aceast\u0103 problem\u0103, ci a invocat o\u00a0analiz\u0103 intern\u0103<\/strong>\u00a0a Comisiei de judec\u0103tori pentru legisla\u021bie. Aceasta a ajuns la concluzia c\u0103 Legea 361\/2022 nu s-ar aplica instan\u021belor de judecat\u0103, deoarece textul legii nu vizeaz\u0103 judec\u0103torii. <\/strong>CSM sus\u021bine c\u0103, deoarece legea nu enumer\u0103 explicit judec\u0103torii, ace\u0219tia\u00a0nu sunt acoperi\u021bi<\/strong>\u00a0de protec\u021bie.<\/p>\n

APADOR-CH, organiza\u021bie care a militat pentru transpunerea extins\u0103 \u00een lege<\/a> a Directivei europene \u00een domeniul avertizorilor, consider\u0103 c\u0103 principiul general al legii este c\u0103 dac\u0103 denun\u021bi o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a legii \u00een interes public, ai drept la protec\u021bie<\/strong>, principiu care trebuie s\u0103 se aplice \u0219i \u00een domeniul justi\u021biei.<\/p>\n

Ce spune Directiva UE despre avertizori?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u00cen opinia APADOR-CH, Directiva (UE) 2019\/1937, care a stat la baza Legii 361\/2022,\u00a0nu exclude justi\u021bia<\/strong>. Ba chiar spune, la articolul 2, c\u0103 aceast\u0103 directiv\u0103 nu aduce atingere competen\u021bei statelor membre de a extinde protec\u021bia \u00een temeiul dreptului intern, \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te domeniile sau actele care nu intr\u0103 sub inciden\u021ba acestei directive. Deci Rom\u00e2nia poate \u0219i ar trebui s\u0103 extind\u0103 protec\u021bia la justi\u021bie<\/strong>. CSM, \u00eens\u0103, pare s\u0103 fac\u0103 exact opusul:\u00a0o restr\u00e2nge<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Legea ar trebui s\u0103 se aplice tuturor celor care denun\u021b\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri ale legii \u00een interes public, indiferent de profesie, pozi\u021bie social\u0103 sau post ocupat.<\/p>\n

Ce e de f\u0103cut?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Cea mai sigur\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103 este modificarea Legii avertizorilor, pentru a clarifica acest aspect.<\/p>\n

O modificare a Legii 361\/2022 ar elimina disputele privind interpretarea \u0219i aplicarea ei. <\/strong>Dac\u0103 legiuitorul a vrut s\u0103-i includ\u0103 pe to\u021bi cei care denun\u021b\u0103 nereguli \u00een interes public, atunci trebuie s\u0103 o spun\u0103 explicit, pentru a preveni abuzuri interpretative.<\/p>\n

Modificarea ar trebui s\u0103 includ\u0103, a\u0219adar, \u201epersoanele care \u00ee\u0219i exercit\u0103 func\u021biile \u00een cadrul instan\u021belor de judecat\u0103 \u0219i parchetelor\u201d.<\/p>\n

De asemenea, modificarea legii ar trebui s\u0103 se fac\u0103 obligatoriu cu consultarea CSM<\/strong>, pentru ca textul rezultat \u00een urma modific\u0103rii s\u0103 nu mai ridice probleme de interpretare.<\/p>\n

Protec\u021bia avertizorilor este un pilon al sistemului democratic. Iar justi\u021bia nu poate fi just\u0103 dac\u0103 cei care o aplic\u0103 nu pot denun\u021ba abuzurile din interior.<\/p>\n

Am cerut Ministerului Justi\u021biei s\u0103 demareze procedurile de modificare a legii.<\/p>\n

UDATE 25 martie 2026<\/strong> Surpriz\u0103! Ministerul Justi\u021biei NU e de acord cu CSM \u0219i spune c\u0103 Legea avertizorilor li se aplic\u0103 \u0219i magistra\u021bilor, pentru c\u0103 \u0219i ei sunt ni\u0219te lucr\u0103tori care au dreptul s\u0103 semnaleze neregulile de la locul lor de munc\u0103.<\/p>\n

<\/i> Citi\u021bi r\u0103spunsul foarte clar primit de la MJ<\/span><\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

Conform CSM, un judec\u0103tor care semnaleaz\u0103 o ilegalitate NU e protejat de Legea avertizorilor; APADOR-CH cere modificarea legii<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10251,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,81],"tags":[1451,571,83,459,1458],"class_list":["post-11862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-advocacy-legislativ","category-slider","tag-avertizori-de-integritate","tag-consiliul-superior-al-magistraturii","tag-csm","tag-judecatori","tag-legea-avertizorilor-de-integritate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11862"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11862\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12059,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11862\/revisions\/12059"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}