{"id":1500,"date":"2005-02-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-02-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/seamus\/comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-necesitatea-dezincriminrii-calomniei-2\/"},"modified":"2023-11-08T15:05:23","modified_gmt":"2023-11-08T13:05:23","slug":"comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-necesitatea-dezincriminrii-calomniei-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-necesitatea-dezincriminrii-calomniei-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Comunicat al APADOR-CH cu privire la necesitatea dezincrimin\u0103rii calomniei"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p align=\"justify\"><b>APADOR-CH constat\u0103 cu \u00eengrijorare apari\u0163ia unui nou caz \u00een care libertatea de exprimare este pus\u0103 \u00een pericol prin pronun\u0163area unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti \u00een contradic\u0163ie cu Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei \u015fi cu jurispruden\u0163a Cur\u0163ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului. <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Recenta condamnarea a domnului Marian Opri\u015fan la amend\u0103 penal\u0103 de 20 de milioane lei \u00eentr-un proces de calomnie readuce \u00een actualitate problema incrimin\u0103rii penale a delictelor de opinie. APADOR-CH a sus\u0163inut constant necesitatea elimin\u0103rii infrac\u0163iunilor de insult\u0103 \u015fi calomnie din Codul penal, \u00een vederea alinierii legisla\u0163iei interne cu standardele \u015fi practicile interna\u0163ionale \u00een materie.<b> <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>Condamnarea penal\u0103 a unei persoane pentru un delict de opinie reprezint\u0103 o sanc\u0163iune dispropor\u0163ionat\u0103 care afecteaz\u0103 exercitarea dreptului la liber\u0103 exprimare<\/b>. <b>Demnitatea \u015fi onoarea persoanelor fizice pot fi reparate pe calea unor ac\u0163iuni civile, \u00een care desp\u0103gubirile acordate de instan\u0163e s\u0103 fie \u00een limite rezonabile. \u00cen jurispruden\u0163a CEDO exist\u0103 chiar hot\u0103r\u00e2ri prin care <i>\u00eens\u0103\u015fi confirmarea existen\u0163ei unei \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri a drepturilor omului este considerat\u0103 o compensa\u0163ie moral\u0103 suficient\u0103 pentru victim\u0103.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Noul Cod penal, care va intra \u00een vigoare \u00een luna iunie a anului 2005, reprezint\u0103 un progres \u00een reglementarea delictelor de opinie, insulta fiind eliminat\u0103. Cu toate acestea, calomnia este \u00een continuare incriminat\u0103, pedeapsa prev\u0103zut\u0103 fiind amenda penal\u0103 \u00eentre 2 \u015fi 120 de milioane lei. Amenzile aplicate \u00een baza Codului penal pot atinge cu u\u015furin\u0163\u0103 un cuantum dispropor\u0163ionat \u015fi, \u00een plus, sunt \u00eenscrise \u00een cazierul judiciar al persoanei condamnate.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>APADOR-CH reaminte\u015fte c\u0103 majoritatea jurnali\u015ftilor sanc\u0163iona\u0163i pentru exprimarea unor opinii critice \u00een chestiuni de interes public sunt condamna\u0163i pe baza prevederilor penale privind calomnia. Simpla existen\u0163\u0103 a acestora \u00een Codul penal este de natur\u0103 s\u0103 duc\u0103 la autocenzur\u0103 \u015fi, \u00een consecin\u0163\u0103, la limitarea dezbaterilor \u00een chestiuni de interes public, dezbateri care reprezint\u0103 un element esen\u0163ial al unei societ\u0103\u0163i democratice<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><b>\u00cen consecin\u0163\u0103, APADOR-CH solicit\u0103 autorit\u0103\u0163ilor competente ale statului s\u0103 ini\u0163ieze de urgen\u0163\u0103 procedurile de dezincriminare a calomniei, \u00een concordan\u0163\u0103 cu priorit\u0103\u0163ile declarate ale actualei guvern\u0103ri, care includ \u015fi asigurarea libert\u0103\u0163ii de exprimare \u015fi a libert\u0103\u0163ii presei.<\/b><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>APADOR-CH constat&#259; cu \u00eengrijorare apari&#355;ia unui nou caz \u00een care libertatea de exprimare este pus&#259; \u00een pericol prin pronun&#355;area unei hot&#259;r\u00e2ri judec&#259;tore&#351;ti \u00een contradic&#355;ie cu Constitu&#355;ia Rom\u00e2niei &#351;i cu jurispruden&#355;a Cur&#355;ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comunicate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1500"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10843,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1500\/revisions\/10843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}