{"id":1543,"date":"2009-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-23T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/seamus\/comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-hotrarea-cedo-in-cazul-taru-impotriva-romaniei-2\/"},"modified":"2019-05-27T20:42:47","modified_gmt":"2019-05-27T18:42:47","slug":"comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-hotrarea-cedo-in-cazul-taru-impotriva-romaniei-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/comunicat-al-apador-ch-cu-privire-la-hotrarea-cedo-in-cazul-taru-impotriva-romaniei-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Comunicat al APADOR-CH cu privire la hot&#259;r\u00e2rea CEDO \u00een cazul Tar&#259;u \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p><\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>Ast&#259;zi, 24 februarie<br \/>\n    2009, Curtea European&#259; a Drepturilor Omului s-a pronun&#355;at cu privire<br \/>\n    la pl\u00e2ngerea \u00eenaintat&#259; de reclamanta Daniela Tar&#259;u \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei<br \/>\n  &#351;i a condamnat statul rom\u00e2n pentru \u00eenc&#259;lcarea dreptului la libertate<br \/>\n  &#351;i siguran&#355;&#259; precum &#351;i a dreptului la un proces echitabil.<br \/>\n    Reclamanta a fost sus&#355;inut&#259; \u00een demersurile sale \u00een fa&#355;a<br \/>\n  Cur&#355;ii Europene de APADOR-CH.<\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>Reclamanta a fost<br \/>\n    arestat&#259; preventiv timp de 11 luni \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu februarie 2001 &#351;i s-a<br \/>\n    pl\u00e2ns \u00een fa&#355;a Cur&#355;ii europene de \u00eenc&#259;lcarea dreptului persoanei<br \/>\n    arestate preventiv de a fi eliberat&#259; dup&#259; o durat&#259; rezonabil&#259;<br \/>\n  a priv&#259;rii de libertate (apreciat&#259; \u00een raport de con&#355;inutul<br \/>\n    faptelor re&#355;inute \u00een sarcina sa &#351;i de datele ce individualizeaz&#259;<br \/>\n  acea persoan&#259;), precum &#351;i a dreptului persoanei arestate de a<br \/>\n    contesta arestarea sau prelungirea acesteia \u00een condi&#355;ii de egalitate a<br \/>\n    armelor \u00eentre arestat &#351;i procuror. \u00cen leg&#259;tur&#259; cu procedura<br \/>\n    penal&#259; ce a urmat arest&#259;rii preventive, reclamanta a mai<br \/>\n    sus&#355;inut &#351;i \u00eenc&#259;lcarea dreptului s&#259;u la un proces<br \/>\n    echitabil, sub aspectul dreptului de a pune \u00eentreb&#259;ri martorilor audia&#355;i<br \/>\n  \u00een cauz&#259; &#351;i de a cere &#351;i ob&#355;ine audierea martorilor \u00een ap&#259;rare.<\/p>\n<p class=normal style='text-align:justify'>\u00cen hot&#259;r\u00e2rea de ast&#259;zi, Curtea European&#259;<br \/>\n  a constatat \u00een unanimitate c&#259; statul rom\u00e2n a \u00eenc&#259;lcat dreptul la<br \/>\n    libertate al reclamantei deoarece autorit&#259;&#355;ile nu au justificat<br \/>\n    necesitatea prelungirii arest&#259;rii preventive pe baza unui pericol pentru<br \/>\n    ordinea public&#259; &#351;i nici nu i-au asigurat reclamantei o participare<br \/>\n    adecvat&#259; &#351;i o ap&#259;rare efectiv&#259; \u00een cadrul procedurii de<br \/>\n    recurs \u00eempotriva prelungirii arest&#259;rii. Curtea a mai condamnat statul<br \/>\n    rom\u00e2n deoarece \u00een cadrul procesului penal, reclamanta nu a putut ob&#355;ine<br \/>\n    audierea majorit&#259;&#355;ii martorilor acuz&#259;rii &#351;i a nici unui<br \/>\n  martor propus de ap&#259;rare.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>Textul integral<br \/>\n  al hot&#259;r\u00e2rii este disponibil \u00een limba francez&#259; pe site-ul www.echr.coe.int.<\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>24 februarie 2009<\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>APADOR-CH<\/p>\n<p style='text-align:justify'>Pentru detalii<br \/>\n  suplimentare: Diana-Olivia Hatneanu \u2013 director executiv APADOR-CH, telefon 021.312.45.28.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea European&#259; a Drepturilor Omului s-a pronun&#355;at cu privire la pl\u00e2ngerea \u00eenaintat&#259; de reclamanta Daniela Tar&#259;u \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei &#351;i a condamnat statul rom\u00e2n pentru \u00eenc&#259;lcarea dreptului la libertate &#351;i siguran&#355;&#259; precum &#351;i a dreptului la un proces echitabil. Reclamanta a fost sus&#355;inut&#259; \u00een demersurile sale \u00een fa&#355;a Cur&#355;ii Europene de APADOR-CH.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,839],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comunicate","category-procese-castigate-la-cedo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}