{"id":2916,"date":"2014-04-08T16:20:41","date_gmt":"2014-04-08T16:20:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=2916"},"modified":"2014-04-08T17:15:36","modified_gmt":"2014-04-08T17:15:36","slug":"legea-big-brother-nu-trebuia-sa-existe-a-spus-o-azi-curtea-de-justitie-a-ue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/legea-big-brother-nu-trebuia-sa-existe-a-spus-o-azi-curtea-de-justitie-a-ue\/","title":{"rendered":"Legea Big Brother nu trebuia s\u0103 existe! \u2013 a spus-o azi Curtea de Justi\u021bie a UE"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Organiza\u021biile semnatare salut\u0103 decizia <\/a><\/span>Cur\u021bii de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene<\/b><\/a>, care a invalidat azi Directiva 2006\/24\/EC privind p\u0103strarea datelor de trafic informa\u021bional, cunoscut\u0103 sub denumirea de \u201e<\/span>Directiva Big Brother\u201d, <\/b>\u0219i<\/span> <\/b>solicit\u0103 autorit\u0103\u021bilor rom\u00e2ne \u2013 Guvernului \u0219i Parlamentului – s\u0103 procedeze de urgen\u021b\u0103 la abrogarea legisla\u021biei rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti care transpune aceast\u0103 directiv\u0103.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene (CJUE) a declarat ast\u0103zi invalid\u0103<\/b> Directiva[1]<\/b><\/a> European\u0103 2006\/24\/EC<\/b>, care impunea obliga\u021bia statelor de a colecta date privind comunica\u021biile electronice \u0219i de telefonie ale cet\u0103\u021benilor pentru o perioad\u0103 de cel pu\u021bin \u0219ase luni.<\/p>\n

Directiva a fost transpus\u0103 \u00een ordinea de drept rom\u00e2n\u0103 prin Legea nr. 82\/2012, \u00een ciuda opozi\u021biei societ\u0103\u021bii civile \u0219i cu toate c\u0103 o lege similar\u0103 fusese declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103, prin Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale nr. 1258 din 8 octombrie 2009. Argumentele CCR s-au bazat \u00een <\/b>principal\u00a0<\/b>pe \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la via\u021b\u0103 privat\u0103, prin obliga\u021bia general aplicabil\u0103 de a p\u0103stra date care sunt legate \u00een mod direct de comunica\u021biile private ale<\/strong>\u00a0<\/b>tuturor<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0<\/b>cet\u0103\u021benilor. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Organiza\u021biile semnatare au cerut \u00een repetate r\u00e2nduri<\/strong>[2]<\/a> autorit\u0103\u021bilor rom\u00e2ne s\u0103 refuze implementarea directivei, chiar cu riscul declan\u0219\u0103rii unei proceduri de infringement, \u0219i au cerut statului rom\u00e2n s\u0103 militeze la nivel european pentru anularea directivei. Principalul argument a fost acela c\u0103 prin colectarea tuturor datelor se \u00eencalc\u0103 principiul propor\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i to\u021bi cet\u0103\u021benii sunt trata\u021bi ca suspec\u021bi de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea unor infrac\u021biuni. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Prin decizia de azi, CJUE a statuat c\u0103 <\/strong>prin impunerea p\u0103str\u0103rii acestor date \u0219i permi\u021b\u00e2nd accesul autorit\u0103\u021bilor na\u021bionale competente, directiva reprezint\u0103 o imixtiune deosebit de grav\u0103 \u00een drepturile fundamentale la respectarea vie\u021bii private \u0219i la protec\u021bia datelor cu caracter personal<\/b>. \u00cen plus, faptul c\u0103 p\u0103strarea \u0219i utilizarea ulterioar\u0103 a datelor sunt efectuate, f\u0103r\u0103 ca abonatul sau utilizatorul \u00eenregistrat s\u0103 fie informat, poate da persoanelor vizate sentimentul c\u0103 via\u021ba lor privat\u0103 este obiectul unei supravegheri constante.<\/p>\n

Admi\u021b\u00e2nd c\u0103 motivele care au stat la baza adopt\u0103rii directivei sunt legitime, scopul urm\u0103rit fiind combaterea criminalit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i siguran\u021ba public\u0103, Curtea a constatat c\u0103 legiuitorul Uniunii a dep\u0103\u0219it limitele impuse de respectarea principiului propor\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Curtea a precizat c\u0103 p\u0103strarea datelor de trafic (\u0219i implicit directiva) reprezint\u0103 o interferen\u021b\u0103 serioas\u0103 cu dreptul fundamental la via\u021b\u0103 privat\u0103 statuat \u00een Articolul 7 din Carta UE a Drepturilor Omului. Reamintim faptul c\u0103 tratatele interna\u021bionale de drepturile omului, deci inclusiv Carta UE a Drepturilor Omului la care Romania este parte, au prioritate \u00een fa\u021ba legilor interne, \u00een conformitate cu art. 20 din Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei. <\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Decizia CJUE\u00a0 din 8 aprilie 2014 consfin\u021be\u0219te importan\u021ba respect\u0103rii drepturilor \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bilor cet\u0103\u021bene\u0219ti pentru construc\u021bia european\u0103. Solicit\u0103m Guvernului \u0219i Parlamentului Rom\u00e2niei s\u0103 se alinieze acestei decizii \u0219i s\u0103 adopte de urgen\u021b\u0103 m\u0103surile care se impun pentru abogarea Legii nr. 82\/2012 \u0219i a celorlalte reglement\u0103ri derivate din aceasta.<\/b><\/p>\n

Semnatari:<\/b><\/p>\n

Maria Nicoleta Andreescu, Asocia\u021bia pentru Ap\u0103rarea Drepturilor Omului \u00een Rom\u00e2nia \u2013 Comitetul Helsinki (APADOR-CH)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bogdan Manolea, Asocia\u0163ia pentru Tehnologie \u015fi Internet (ApTI)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mircea Toma, ActiveWatch \u2013 Asocia\u0163ia de Monitorizare a Presei<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ioana Av\u0103dani, Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gheorghe \u0218erban, Asocia\u0163ia Na\u0163ional\u0103 a Internet Service Providerilor (ANISP)<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n

[1]<\/a> Directiva 2006\/24\/CE a Parlamentului European \u0219i a Consiliului din 15 martie 2006 privind p\u0103strarea datelor generate sau prelucrate \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu furnizarea serviciilor de comunica\u021bii electronice accesibile publicului sau de re\u021bele de comunica\u021bii publice \u0219i de modificare a Directivei 2002\/58\/CE (JO L 105, p. 54, Edi\u021bie special\u0103, 13\/vol. 53, p. 51).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

[2]<\/a> http:\/\/blog.activewatch.ro\/tag\/big-brother\/<\/a> ; http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/traian-basescu-chemat-sa-nu-l-promulge-pe-big-brother\/<\/a>; http:\/\/apti.ro\/opinii-ong-date-trafic-lege-august-2011<\/a>; http:\/\/www.apador.org\/observaii-la-proiectul-de-lege-privind-reinerea-datelor-generate-sau-prelucrate-de-furnizorii-de-servicii-de-comunicaii-electronice-destinate-publicului-sau-de-reele-publice-de-2\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Pentru detalii,<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Maria Nicoleta Andreescu, director executiv APADOR-CH,\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

0733.078.721<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

e-mail: office@apador.org website:\u00a0www.apador.org<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

Curtea de Justi\u021bie a Uniunii Europene a decis c\u0103 Directiva Big Brother este invalid\u0103. Solicit\u0103m Parlamentului Rom\u00e2niei s\u0103 abroge Legea nr. 82\/2012 prin care a transpus directiva \u00een legisla\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2917,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,81],"tags":[41,119,46,122,121,124,120,123],"class_list":["post-2916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comunicate","category-slider","tag-apador-ch","tag-big-brother","tag-comunicat","tag-curtea-de-justitie-a-uniunii-europene","tag-directiva-europeana-200624","tag-legea-182012","tag-monitorizare","tag-uniunea-europeana"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2916\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}