{"id":3895,"date":"2015-01-21T13:22:08","date_gmt":"2015-01-21T13:22:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=3895"},"modified":"2015-01-21T15:11:51","modified_gmt":"2015-01-21T15:11:51","slug":"legea-securitatii-cibernetice-inca-o-tentativa-a-serviciilor-de-intra-in-viata-privata-a-cetatenilor-e-neconstitutionala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/legea-securitatii-cibernetice-inca-o-tentativa-a-serviciilor-de-intra-in-viata-privata-a-cetatenilor-e-neconstitutionala\/","title":{"rendered":"Legea securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice, \u00eenc\u0103 o tentativ\u0103 a serviciilor de a intra \u00een via\u021ba privat\u0103 a cet\u0103\u021benilor, e neconstitu\u021bional\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Asocia\u021bia pentru Ap\u0103rarea Drepturilor Omului \u00een Rom\u00e2nia \u2013 Comitetul Helsinki (APADOR-CH) \u0219i Asocia\u021bia pentru Tehnologie \u015fi Internet (ApTI) salut\u0103 decizia CCR de a declara neconstitu\u021bional\u0103, \u00een ansamblu, Legea securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice. Aceast\u0103 lege reprezint\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 o tentativ\u0103 a legiuitorului, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu serviciile de informa\u021bii, de intruziune \u00een via\u021ba privat\u0103 a individului sub pretextul luptei \u00eempotriva terorismului.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Conform comunicatului CCR<\/a>\u00a0legea este considerat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 \u00een ansamblul ei, judec\u0103torii consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 sunt mai multe articole, dec\u00e2t semnalase societatea civil\u0103, care \u00eencalc\u0103 Constitu\u021bia. <\/b>Principalele articole neconstitu\u021bionale, a\u0219a cum au fost ele sesizate de societatea civil\u0103 sunt 2, 3, 16 \u0219i 17<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u00cen ultimii cinci ani Rom\u00e2nia a traversat o \u00eentrecere absurd\u0103 \u00eentre autorit\u0103\u021bile statului \u2013 care au impus legi pentru controlul absolut asupra comunica\u021biilor cet\u0103\u021benilor \u2013 \u0219i justi\u021bia, care le-a declarat neconstitu\u021bionale. Organiza\u021biile semnatare au semnalat de fiecare dat\u0103 aceste derapaje \u0219i au cerut parlamentarilor \u021b\u0103rii s\u0103-\u0219i \u00eenfr\u00e2neze sl\u0103biciunile \u00een fa\u021ba serviciilor de informa\u021bii \u0219i s\u0103-\u0219i canalizeze eforturile spre legiferarea conform\u0103 cu interesul public \u0219i \u00een respect fa\u021b\u0103 de drepturile fundamentale ale omului.<\/p>\n

Consider\u0103m c\u0103 dup\u0103 patru verdicte na\u021bionale de neconstitu\u021bionalitate, plus o invalidare european\u0103, date \u00een ultimii 5 ani pe aceea\u0219i tem\u0103, Parlamentul, Guvernul \u0219i serviciile de informa\u021bii ar trebui s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 c\u0103 dorin\u021bele lor contravin drepturilor fundamentale ale cet\u0103\u021benilor.<\/p>\n

O cronologie a invalid\u0103rii legilor din categoria \u201eBig brother\u201d:<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Re\u0163inerea datelor de trafic, de localizare \u015fi de identificare, de c\u0103tre furnizorii de servicii \u015fi re\u0163ele de comunica\u0163ii electronice a generat nenum\u0103rate controverse \u00eenc\u0103 de la apari\u0163ia Directivei europene nr. 2006\/24\/UE. \u00cen Rom\u00e2nia, prima lege (Legea nr.298\/2008<\/a>) prin care s-a dorit transpunerea directivei a fost declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u0163ional\u0103<\/a>, Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 (CCR) baz\u00e2ndu-\u015fi argumentele \u00een principal pe \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la via\u0163\u0103 privat\u0103 prin obliga\u0163ia general aplicabil\u0103 de a p\u0103stra date care sunt legate \u00een mod direct de comunica\u0163iile private ale tuturor cet\u0103\u0163enilor.<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00cen 2012, o nou\u0103 lege privind re\u021binerea datelor (Legea nr.82\/2012)<\/a> a fost adoptat\u0103 de c\u0103tre Parlamentul Rom\u00e2niei. \u0218i aceasta a fost declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 de c\u0103tre CCR<\/a>, \u00een iulie 2014. Cu unanimitate de voturi, Curtea a admis excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate \u015fi a constatat c\u0103 dispozi\u0163iile Legii nr.82\/2012 privind re\u0163inerea datelor sunt neconstitu\u0163ionale.<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00cens\u0103\u0219i Directiva european\u0103 privind reten\u021bia datelor<\/a> a fost invalidat\u0103 \u00een luna aprilie 2014, de Curtea de Justi\u021bie European\u0103. Aceasta a deschis calea statelor europene care implementaser\u0103 directiva s\u0103-\u0219i abroge legile na\u021bionale.<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00cen loc s\u0103 profite \u0219i s\u0103 abroge Legea 82\/2012, Parlamentul Rom\u00e2niei a plusat, adopt\u00e2nd \u00een regim de urgen\u021b\u0103 Legea privind aprobarea Ordonan\u021bei guvernului 111\/2011, prin care mai instituie o m\u0103sur\u0103 abuziv\u0103: \u00eenregistrarea utilizatorilor de cartele Pre-Pay \u0219i a utilizatorilor de re\u021bele Wi-Fi. Aceasta a fost declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 \u00een septembrie 2014<\/a>.<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Aceea\u0219i celeritate din partea legiuitorului a fost manifestat\u0103 \u0219i \u00een privin\u021ba Legii securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice<\/a>, adoptat\u0103 tacit de Camera Deputa\u021bilor \u0219i unanim de Senat \u00een decembrie 2014.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Istoricul legii securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice:<\/b><\/p>\n

Amintim c\u0103 la 19 decembrie 2014, Legea securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice a fost votat\u0103 \u00een unanimitate, \u00eentr-o procedur\u0103 total netransparent\u0103 \u00een Senat, dup\u0103 ce fusese adoptat\u0103 tacit de Camera Deputa\u021bilor. Dup\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103, unii senatori au sus\u021binut c\u0103 nu ai \u0219tiut ce au votat.<\/p>\n

Mai multe organiza\u021bii ale societ\u0103\u021bii civile au ie\u0219it \u00een strad\u0103 \u0219i au f\u0103cut imediat un apel<\/a> c\u0103tre Grupurile parlamentare, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie, Avocatul Poporului \u0219i c\u0103tre pre\u0219edintele Rom\u00e2niei, ca s\u0103 \u00eentreprind\u0103 fiecare demersurile constitu\u021bionale pe care le au la \u00eendem\u00e2n\u0103 pentru a repara gafa senatorilor.<\/p>\n

Decizia de azi a CCR vine ca urmare a sesiz\u0103rii depus\u0103 de Grupul parlamentar al Partidului Na\u021bional Liberal, imediat dup\u0103 votarea legii \u00een Senat.<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

Pentru semnatari, <\/b><\/p>\n

Bogdan Manolea \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/b>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Maria-Nicoleta Andreescu<\/b><\/p>\n

Director executiv \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Director executiv<\/p>\n

Asocia\u021bia pentru Tehnologie \u0219i Internet \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 APADOR-CH<\/p>\n

Organiza\u021biile societ\u0103\u021bii civile care au contestat constitu\u021bionalitatea Legii securit\u0103\u021bii cibernetice:<\/b><\/p>\n

Mircea Toma, Pre\u0219edinte, ActiveWatch<\/p>\n

\u0218tefan C\u00e2ndea, Centrul Rom\u00e2n pentru Jurnalism de Investiga\u021bie<\/p>\n

Mihail Bumbe\u0219, Pre\u0219edinte, Asocia\u021bia Mili\u021bia Spiritual\u0103<\/p>\n

Laura \u0218tefan, Expert anticorup\u021bie, Expert Forum<\/p>\n

Violeta Alexandru, Director, Institutul pentru Politici Publice<\/p>\n

Tiberiu-Constantin Turbureanu, Pre\u0219edinte, Funda\u021bia Ceata<\/p>\n

Gabriel Petrescu, Director executiv, Funda\u021bia pentru o societate deschis\u0103<\/p>\n

Claudiu Marginean, Pre\u0219edinte, Asociatia Copyratul Roman<\/p>\n

Vasile Cr\u0103ciunescu, Pre\u0219edinte, Asociatia Geo-Spatial.org<\/p>\n

Elena Calistru, Pre\u0219edinte, Asocia\u021bia Funky Citizens<\/p>\n

Oana Preda, Director Executiv CeRe, Centrul de Resurse pentru Participare Public\u0103<\/p>\n

C\u0103t\u0103lin Heghe\u0219, director executiv Asocia\u021bia Pentru Min\u021bi Pertinente AMPER<\/p>\n

Cristian Ghinea, director Centrul Rom\u00e2n pentru Politici Europene CRPE<\/p>\n

Ioana Av\u0103dani, director executiv Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent CJI<\/p>\n

Ionu\u021b Oprea, Pre\u0219edinte al Asocia\u021biei Interactive Advertising Bureau\u00a0Rom\u00e2nia (IAB Rom\u00e2nia)<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 constat\u0103 c\u0103 legea este neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 \u00een ansamblul ei, judec\u0103torii consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 mai multe articole dec\u00e2t semnalase societatea civil\u0103 \u00eencalc\u0103 Constitu\u021bia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":101,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,81],"tags":[41,325,90,308,126,312,161],"class_list":["post-3895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comunicate","category-slider","tag-apador-ch","tag-ccr","tag-curtea-constitutionala","tag-legea-securitatii-cibernetice","tag-neconstitutional","tag-securitate","tag-securitate-cibernetica"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3895\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}