{"id":4125,"date":"2014-01-31T09:42:48","date_gmt":"2014-01-31T09:42:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=4125"},"modified":"2015-04-07T09:48:23","modified_gmt":"2015-04-07T09:48:23","slug":"motivele-pentru-care-trebuie-amanata-intrarea-in-vigoare-a-codurilor-penal-si-de-procedura-penala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/motivele-pentru-care-trebuie-amanata-intrarea-in-vigoare-a-codurilor-penal-si-de-procedura-penala\/","title":{"rendered":"Motivele pentru care trebuie am\u00e2nat\u0103 intrarea \u00een vigoare a Codurilor Penal \u015fi de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

APADOR-CH solicit\u0103 am\u00e2narea intr\u0103rii \u00een vigoare a codurilor \u00een materie penal\u0103 \u0219i cere autorit\u0103\u021bilor ca \u00een loc de extinderea posibilit\u0103\u021bilor de interceptare a convorbirilor telefonice s\u0103 fie \u00eenl\u0103turate infrac\u021biunile gre\u0219it introduse \u00een noul Cod penal.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

1. APADOR-CH consider\u0103 c\u0103 noul Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 permite interceptarea convorbirilor telefonice \u0219i \u00eenainte de \u00een\u0219tiin\u021barea suspec\u021bilor.<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

APADOR-CH\u00a0 reafirm\u0103 c\u0103 anchetarea infrac\u021biunilor nu trebuie s\u0103 se rezume sau s\u0103 se axeze pe intercept\u0103ri telefonice, \u00eentruc\u00e2t astfel se ajunge la o \u00eenc\u0103lcare grav\u0103 \u0219i necontrolabil\u0103 a vie\u021bii private.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen acest sens, asocia\u021bia consider\u0103 ca necesar\u0103 prevederea din noul Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 \u00een sensul c\u0103 suprevegherea tehnic\u0103 a persoanelor (care include \u0219i interceptarea convorbirilor telefonice) se poate dispune numai dup\u0103 \u00eenceperea urm\u0103ririi penale.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Asocia\u021bia consider\u0103 ca nejustificate temerile exprimate \u00een spa\u021biul public de unele autorit\u0103\u021bi \u00een sensul c\u0103 intercept\u0103rile telefonice nu-\u0219i vor putea atinge scopul de a proba s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea infrac\u021biunilor \u00een condi\u021biile \u00een care ele nu vor putea fi dispuse dec\u00e2t dup\u0103 \u00een\u0219tiin\u021barea suspec\u021bilor c\u0103 sunt urm\u0103ri\u021bi penal.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen realitate, articolul 307 din noul Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 prevede c\u0103 persoanei care a dob\u00e2ndit calitatea de suspect\u00a0i se aduc la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103, \u00eenainte de prima sa audiere<\/span>, aceast\u0103 calitate, fapta pentru care este suspectat\u0103, \u00eencadrarea juridic\u0103 a acesteia \u0219i drepturile procesuale.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Deci, articolul 307 prevede expres c\u0103 suspectul trebuie \u00een\u0219tiin\u021bat cu privire la calitatea sa nu imediat ce a fost \u00eenceput\u0103 urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103, ci doar \u00eenainte de prima sa audiere. Or, termenul dintre \u00eenceperea urm\u0103ririi penale \u0219i prima audiere a suspectului, termen care poate fi de 1-2 luni, este suficient pentru interceptarea comunica\u021biilor suspectului.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103, APADOR-CH\u00a0 \u00ee\u0219i exprim\u0103 opozi\u021bia fa\u021b\u0103 de o eventual\u0103 modificare a noului Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 \u00een sensul reintroducerii posibilit\u0103\u021bii intercept\u0103rii comunica\u021biilor mai \u00eenainte de \u00eenceperea urm\u0103ririi penale.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

2. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, APADOR-CH constat\u0103 lipsa de interes a autorit\u0103\u021bilor de a remedia adev\u0103ratele deficien\u021be ale noilor reglement\u0103ri penale, respectiv ale noului Cod Penal (care ar trebui s\u0103 intre \u00een vigoare la 1 februarie 2014, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu noul Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103).<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen acest context, APADOR-CH\u00a0 dore\u0219te s\u0103 reaminteasc\u0103 faptul c\u0103, \u00eenc\u0103 din anul 2009, c\u00e2nd noul Cod Penal se afla \u00een faza de proiect, a atras public aten\u021bia asupra pericolului pentru libertatea presei pe care-l reprezint\u0103 noua infrac\u021biune de “presiuni asupra justi\u0163iei\u201d<\/b>\u00a0(articolul 276 din noul Cod Penal).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

APADOR-CH\u00a0 a formulat \u00een urm\u0103 cu mai mult de 4 ani, \u00een lunile februarie \u0219i iunie 2009, comentarii \u0219i propuneri, pe care le-a transmis deciden\u021bilor din structurile guvernamentale \u0219i parlamentare.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen aceste comentarii, APADOR-CH\u00a0 a solicitat eliminarea din proiectul noului Cod Penal\u00a0a\u00a0infrac\u021biunii de presiuni asupra justitiei<\/b>, care nu constituie lege previzibil\u0103 \u00een sensul Conven\u0163iei Europene a Drepturilor Omului, \u00eentruc\u00e2t textul articolului 276 este redactat extrem de larg, vag, ambiguu \u015fi permite s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea de abuzuri prin care se va \u00eempiedica punerea \u00een discu\u0163ia liber\u0103 a membrilor comunit\u0103\u0163ii a unor chestiuni de interes public privind buna func\u0163ionare a autorit\u0103\u0163ilor publice.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Asocia\u021bia a aten\u021bionat \u00eenc\u0103 din luna februarie 2009 c\u0103 articolul 276 instituie o protec\u0163ie excesiv\u0103\u00a0 at\u00e2t pentru judec\u0103tor, c\u00eet mai ales pentru organele de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 \u00een situa\u0163ia \u00een care o persoan\u0103 ar face, pe durata procedurii judiciare \u00een curs “declara\u0163ii publice\u201d cu privire la s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea de c\u0103tre ace\u015ftia “a unei infrac\u0163iuni sau a unei abateri disciplinare grave legat\u0103 de instrumentarea respectivei cauze\u201d pentru a-i “influen\u0163a sau intimida\u201d. Asocia\u0163ia a precizat c\u0103 un judec\u0103tor nu poate \u015fi nu trebuie s\u0103 se lase influen\u0163at sau intimidat de declara\u0163ii \u2013 chiar \u015fi publice \u2013 ale uneia din p\u0103r\u0163i. Iar \u00een privin\u0163a organelor de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, este lesne de \u00een\u0163eles c\u0103 nimeni nu va mai avea curajul s\u0103 se pl\u00e2ng\u0103 public \u00eempotriva unor abuzuri pe care acestea \u2013 \u00een primul r\u00e2nd, poli\u0163ia – \u00eenc\u0103 le mai comit pe durata cercet\u0103rii penale.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen acela\u0219i comentarii, APADOR-CH a mai atras aten\u021bia \u0219i asupra pericolului pe care-l reprezint\u0103 pentru func\u021bionarea normal\u0103 a unui sistem democratic \u0219i urm\u0103toarele infrac\u021biuni, \u00een modul deficitar \u00een care au fost reglementate \u00een noul Cod Penal:<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 271 – Obstruc\u0163ionarea\u00a0 justi\u0163iei<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 277 \u2013 Compromiterea intereselor justi\u0163iei.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 278 \u2013 Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 284 \u2013 Asisten\u0163a \u015fi reprezentarea neloial\u0103.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 303 \u2013 Divulgarea informa\u0163iilor secrete de stat.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 304 – Divulgarea informa\u0163iilor secrete de serviciu sau nepublice.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 371 – Tulburarea ordinii \u015fi lini\u015ftii publice.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 405 \u2013 Propaganda pentru r\u0103zboi.<\/b><\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 407\u00a0 – Divulgarea secretului care pericliteaz\u0103 securitatea na\u0163ional\u0103<\/b>.<\/p>\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Art. 434 \u2013 Sustragerea de la luarea \u00een eviden\u0163a militar\u0103.<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Comentariile APADOR-CH\u00a0 din lunile februarie \u0219i iunie 2009 pot fi consultate, integral\u00a0aici<\/a>\u00a0\u015fi\u00a0aici<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

APADOR-CH constat\u0103 c\u0103 deciden\u021bii politici, indiferent de culoarea politic\u0103 dominant\u0103, au manifestat consecven\u021b\u0103 doar \u00een ignorarea sistematic\u0103 a semnalelor critice ale societ\u0103\u021bii civile.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103,\u00a0APADOR-CH\u00a0solicit\u0103 am\u00e2narea intr\u0103rii \u00een vigoare<\/span>\u00a0a noului Cod Penal \u0219i, implicit, a noului Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 la finele vacan\u021bei judec\u0103tore\u0219ti, pentru remedierea deficien\u021belor semnalate.<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

APADOR-CH solicit\u0103 am\u00e2narea intr\u0103rii \u00een vigoare a codurilor \u00een materie penal\u0103 \u0219i cere autorit\u0103\u021bilor ca \u00een loc de extinderea posibilit\u0103\u021bilor de interceptare a convorbirilor telefonice s\u0103 fie \u00eenl\u0103turate infrac\u021biunile gre\u0219it introduse \u00een noul Cod penal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[41,361,360],"class_list":["post-4125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comunicate","tag-apador-ch","tag-cod-de-procedura-penala","tag-cod-penal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}