{"id":6301,"date":"2018-06-19T11:38:13","date_gmt":"2018-06-19T09:38:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=6301"},"modified":"2018-06-19T14:01:54","modified_gmt":"2018-06-19T12:01:54","slug":"cat-de-impartiali-si-obiectivi-mai-par-judecatorii-dupa-desecretizarea-protocolului-cu-sri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/cat-de-impartiali-si-obiectivi-mai-par-judecatorii-dupa-desecretizarea-protocolului-cu-sri\/","title":{"rendered":"C\u00e2t de impar\u021biali mai par judec\u0103torii dup\u0103 desecretizarea protocolului cu SRI?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6301\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Opinia APADOR-CH cu privire la protocolul at\u00e2t de secret de \u201ecooperare\u201d \u00eentre SRI, ICCJ \u0219i PICCJ \u00eenc\u00e2t una dintre p\u0103r\u021bi nici m\u0103car nu \u0219tie c\u0103 l-a semnat<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Asocia\u0163ia constat\u0103 c\u0103 reprezentantul uneia dintre cele trei p\u0103r\u0163i, respectiv pre\u015fedintele instan\u0163ei supreme de la data \u00eencheierii protocolului, men\u0163ionat nominal \u00een protocol ca semnatar al acestuia, contest\u0103 public faptul c\u0103 ar fi \u015ftiut \u015fi c\u0103 ar fi semnat un astfel de protocol. Pozi\u021bia fostului pre\u0219edinte al ICCJ sugereaz\u0103 c\u0103 acest protocol a fost at\u00e2t de secret \u00eenc\u00e2t cel pu\u0163in una dintre cele trei p\u0103r\u0163i ale sale nici nu a avut cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 de existen\u0163a acestuia \u015fi nici nu a \u0219tiut c\u0103 l-a semnat.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Totu\u0219i, \u00een opinia a<\/strong><strong>socia\u0163i<\/strong><strong>ei<\/strong> <strong>nu numele semnatarilor este important ci chiar existen\u021ba acestui protocol, al c\u0103rui scop principal, <\/strong><strong>de a reglementa o form\u0103 de cooperare dintre judec\u0103tori, procurori \u015fi lucr\u0103tori SRI, este criticabil<\/strong><strong>\u0103<\/strong><strong> \u00een sine.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Judec\u0103torii sunt cei care trebuie s\u0103 cenzureze m\u0103surile dispuse sau solicit\u0103rile formulate de procurori sau, \u00een cazul m\u0103surilor de supraveghere pe motive de securitate na\u0163ional\u0103, solicit\u0103rile formulate ini\u0163ial de SRI \u015fi transmise de procurori.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ideea c\u0103 judec\u0103torul, care, teoretic, trebuie s\u0103-l apere pe cet\u0103\u0163ean de eventualele abuzuri\/excese de zel ale parchetului\/SRI, coopereaz\u0103 \u00een baza unui protocol secret cu procurorul \u015fi cu SRI este de natur\u0103 a crea un sentiment de ne\u00eencredere public\u0103 legat de obiectivitatea, impar\u0163ialitatea judec\u0103torului.<\/strong> Cel pu\u0163in, \u00een materia autoriz\u0103rii mandatelor de supraveghere pe motive de securitate na\u0163ional\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Asocia\u0163ia precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103, potrivit art. 2 lit. a din protocol, p\u0103r\u0163ile, deci ofi\u0163erii de informa\u0163ii, judec\u0103torii \u015fi procurorii \u00ee\u015fi iau obliga\u0163ia <u>s\u0103 coopereze pentru realizarea m\u0103surilor ce duc la autorizarea mandatelor de supraveghere<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cu alte cuvinte, judec\u0103torii trebuie s\u0103 coopereze cu lucr\u0103torii SRI \u015fi cu procurorii pentru ca mandatele de supraveghere s\u0103 poat\u0103 fi autorizate cu succes. \u0162ine de logica elementar\u0103 c\u0103 o \u201ccooperare\u201d \u00eentre p\u0103r\u0163i se face pentru succesul ac\u0163iunii lor, \u00een spe\u0163\u0103, autorizarea mandatelor, nu pentru insucces (neautorizarea). Iar, \u00een practic\u0103, aceast\u0103 cooperare chiar a dat roade, \u00eentruc\u00e2t dintre cele peste <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediafax.ro\/social\/peste-26-000-de-mandate-de-siguranta-nationala-au-fost-emise-de-instanta-suprema-in-ultimii-noua-ani-17251026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">26.000 de mandate de supraveghere solicitate de SRI<\/a> \u00een ultimii 9 ani, judec\u0103torii nu au respins dec\u00e2t unul (!).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">De asemenea, potrivit art. 3 lit. f din protocol, p\u0103r\u0163ile, deci ofi\u0163erii de informa\u0163ii, judec\u0103torii \u015fi procurorii \u00ee\u015fi iau <u>obliga\u0163ia s\u0103 coopereze pentru elaborarea \u015fi derularea de <\/u><u>\u201e<\/u><em><u>strategii, ac\u0163iuni \u015fi programe comune<\/u><\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen practic\u0103, \u201e<em>elaborarea \u015fi derularea de strategii, ac\u0163iuni \u015fi programe comune<\/em>\u201d poate \u00eensemna orice, de la <em>team building<\/em>\u2013uri judec\u0103tori-procurori-lucr\u0103tori SRI, la strategii comune de ac\u0163iune \u00eentr-un anumit gen de dosare sau la programe de \u00eentrajutorare \u00eentre parteneri de n\u0103dejde.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00centrebarea care r\u0103m\u00e2ne dup\u0103 desecretizarea acestui protocol este \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 mai prezint\u0103 garan\u0163ii de obiectivitate\/impar\u0163ialitate, cel pu\u0163in la nivelul aparen\u0163elor, al imaginii publice, un judec\u0103tor sau o instan\u0163\u0103 care \u015fi-a luat obliga\u0163ia de a coopera cu cei pe care ar fi trebuit s\u0103-i cenzureze.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen acest context, asocia\u0163ia reaminte\u015fte c\u0103, prin mai multe hot\u0103r\u00e2ri, Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului a stabilit c\u0103, pentru a fi \u00eendeplinite condi\u0163iile unui proces echitabil prev\u0103zute \u00een art. 6 din Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului, nu este suficient ca o instan\u0163\u0103 de judecat\u0103 s\u0103 fie impar\u0163ial\u0103, ci este necesar s\u0103 existe \u015fi <strong>aparen\u0163a<\/strong> acestei impar\u0163ialit\u0103\u0163i (imaginea public\u0103 de obiectivitate\/impar\u0163ialitate). Curtea a subliniat importan\u0163a deosebit\u0103 pe care o are \u00eencrederea pe care instan\u0163ele o inspir\u0103 publicului, mai ales atunci c\u00e2nd solu\u0163ioneaz\u0103 dosare penale (a se vedea, de exemplu, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea CEDO din anul 1992 \u00een cauza <em>Thorgeirson v Islanda<\/em>, par. 51).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen concluzie, asocia\u0163ia\u00a0 <strong>consider\u0103 c\u0103 acest protocol, prin unele prevederi excesive privind cooperarea dintre institu\u0163ii, nu a adus beneficii, ci chiar a creat\u00a0 deservicii cel pu\u0163in uneia dintre cele trei p\u0103r\u0163i semnatare (instan\u0163a suprem\u0103), fiind afectat\u0103 imaginea public\u0103\/aparen\u0163a de obiectivitate\/impar\u0163ialitate a instan\u0163ei semnatare.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6301\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n<p>Opinia APADOR-CH cu privire la protocolul at\u00e2t de secret de \u201ecooperare\u201d \u00eentre SRI, ICCJ \u0219i PICCJ \u00eenc\u00e2t una dintre p\u0103r\u021bi nici m\u0103car nu \u0219tie c\u0103 l-a semnat<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4718,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,81],"tags":[41,309,556,459,738,716],"class_list":["post-6301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comunicate","category-slider","tag-apador-ch","tag-iccj","tag-interceptari","tag-judecatori","tag-piccj","tag-protocol-secret-sri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6301\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4718"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}