{"id":6482,"date":"2018-12-13T20:52:57","date_gmt":"2018-12-13T18:52:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=6482"},"modified":"2019-01-21T21:19:39","modified_gmt":"2019-01-21T19:19:39","slug":"cerem-dezbaterea-publica-a-ordonantei-de-modificare-a-codurilor-penale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/cerem-dezbaterea-publica-a-ordonantei-de-modificare-a-codurilor-penale\/","title":{"rendered":"Cerem dezbaterea public\u0103 a ordonan\u021bei de modificare a codurilor penale"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

La \u00eenceputul acestei s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni, mai mul\u0163i reprezentan\u0163i ai partidului majoritar \u015fi ai guvernului au adus la cuno\u015ftin\u0163a publicului inten\u0163ia adopt\u0103rii unei ordonan\u0163e de urgen\u0163\u0103 pentru modificarea Codului penal \u015fi a Codului de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103.<\/p>\n

\u00cen principiu, potrivit art. 115 al. 4 \u015fi 6 din Constitu\u0163ie, \u015fi legile penale pot fi modificate prin ordonan\u0163\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103, dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite cel pu\u0163in urm\u0103toarele dou\u0103 condi\u0163ii:<\/p>\n

– exist\u0103 o situa\u0163ie extraordinar\u0103 a c\u0103rei reglementare nu poate fi am\u00e2nat\u0103 (condi\u0163ia \u201eurgen\u0163ei\u201d)<\/p>\n

– prin aceste modific\u0103ri nu sunt aduse restr\u00e2ngeri noi sau mai mari dec\u00e2t cele existente ale drepturilor \u015fi libert\u0103\u0163ilor prev\u0103zute \u00een Constitu\u0163ie. De exemplu, nu pot fi introduse noi infrac\u0163iuni sau limite mai mari de pedeaps\u0103 sau noi m\u0103suri de supraveghere sau extinderea cazurilor care justific\u0103 arestarea preventiv\u0103 etc.\u00a0 Prin urmare, rezult\u0103 c\u0103 modific\u0103rile aduse printr-o ordonan\u0163\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103 ori sunt neutre (nu se refer\u0103 la drepturi \u015fi libert\u0103\u0163i prev\u0103zute \u00een Constitu\u0163ie), ori sunt mai favorabile dec\u00e2t reglement\u0103rile deja existente cu privire la drepturile \u015fi libert\u0103\u0163ile prev\u0103zute \u00een Constitu\u0163ie (de exemplu, eliminarea\/limitarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere, reducerea cazurilor care justific\u0103 arestarea preventiv\u0103 etc.)<\/p>\n

De altfel, Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u015fi Codul penal au mai fost modificate prin ordonan\u0163e de urgen\u0163\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 ca acestea s\u0103 fie declarate, p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent, neconstitu\u0163ionale. Spre exemplu, Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 a fost modificat prin OUG nr. 3\/2014, OUG nr. 82\/2014, OUG nr. 24\/2015, OUG nr. 6\/2016,\u00a0 OUG nr. 18\/2016, OUG nr. 70\/2016, iar Codul penal a fost modificat prin OUG nr. 18\/2016.<\/p>\n

\u00cen contextul prezentat mai sus, APADOR-CH solicit\u0103 public Guvernului Rom\u00e2nei s\u0103 respecte, ca bun\u0103 practic\u0103, principiul transparen\u0163ei decizionale \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu emiterea acestei ordonan\u0163e de urgen\u0163\u0103<\/u>. \u00cen acest sens, asocia\u0163ia consider\u0103 c\u0103 este absolut necesar ca proiectul ordonan\u0163ei de urgen\u0163\u0103 (\u00een cuprinsul c\u0103ruia trebuie justificat\u0103 urgen\u0163a emiterii acestei ordonan\u0163e) s\u0103 fie publicat pe site-ul Ministerului Justi\u0163iei \u015fi supus dezbaterii publice cu cel pu\u0163in 10 zile \u00eenainte de adoptare<\/strong>. Este adev\u0103rat, Legea nr. 52\/2003 nu prevede obligativitatea dezbaterii publice a proiectelor de ordonat\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103 (care presupun adoptarea unor solu\u0163ii imediate, f\u0103r\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2rziere), dar, ca bun\u0103 practic\u0103, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere importan\u0163a \u015fi ecoul social al unei astfel de ordonan\u0163e, este necesar ca, \u00eenainte de adoptare, con\u0163inutul acestui act normativ s\u0103 fie supus dezbaterii opiniei publice.<\/p>\n

De asemenea, tot ca bun\u0103 practic\u0103, APADOR-CH solicit\u0103 public Guvernului Rom\u00e2niei ca reglement\u0103rile de mare importan\u0163\u0103 \u015fi impact \u00een societate, cum ar fi \u015fi modificarea legilor penale, s\u0103 nu fie \u201estrecurate\u201d \u00een perioada s\u0103rb\u0103torilor ocazionate de Cr\u0103ciun \u015fi de Anul Nou<\/strong>, c\u00e2nd aten\u0163ia marii p\u0103r\u0163i a opiniei publice este (sau ar trebui) orientat\u0103, prioritar, spre alte aspecte dec\u00e2t activitatea de legiferare.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/i> R\u0103spunsul Ministerului Justi\u021biei<\/span><\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

APADOR-CH consider\u0103 c\u0103 proiectul ordonan\u0163ei de urgen\u0163\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 fie publicat pe site-ul Ministerului Justi\u0163iei \u015fi supus dezbaterii publice cu cel pu\u0163in 10 zile \u00eenainte de adoptare, iar emiterea ordonan\u021bei s\u0103 nu se fac\u0103 \u00een perioada s\u0103rb\u0103torilor<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":6483,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,29,81,24],"tags":[482,414,189,129,583,250],"class_list":["post-6482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-buna-guvernare","category-comunicate","category-slider","category-transparenta","tag-codul-de-procedura-penala","tag-codul-penal","tag-dezbatere-publica","tag-guvern","tag-ministerul-justitiei","tag-ordonanta-de-urgenta"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6482\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6483"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}