{"id":6491,"date":"2018-12-18T11:18:15","date_gmt":"2018-12-18T09:18:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/?p=6491"},"modified":"2018-12-18T11:23:06","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T09:23:06","slug":"cum-se-pot-repara-abuzurile-justitiei-fara-amnistie-si-gratiere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/cum-se-pot-repara-abuzurile-justitiei-fara-amnistie-si-gratiere\/","title":{"rendered":"Cum se pot repara abuzurile justi\u021biei f\u0103r\u0103 amnistie \u0219i gra\u021biere"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6491\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p style=\"text-align: justify;\">La Consiliul na\u0163ional al partidului de guvern\u0103m\u00e2nt s-a apreciat c\u0103 este necesar\u0103 adoptarea unei\u00a0 ordonan\u0163e de urgen\u0163\u0103 privind amnistia \u015fi gra\u0163ierea unor pedepse, \u00een cazul \u00een care nu vor fi\u00a0 identificate alte c\u0103i de remediere a prejudiciilor suferite de c\u0103tre victimele unor abuzuri din justi\u0163ie.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Abuzurile din justi\u0163ie invocate \u00een acest context constau \u00een:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211; condamn\u0103ri dispuse de c\u0103tre complete de judecat\u0103 constituite \u00een mod nelegal (completele de 5 judec\u0103tori constituite \u00een cadrul \u00cenaltei Cur\u0163i de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie, \u00een perioada 2014-2018);<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8211; condamn\u0103ri care s-au bazat pe probe ilegale, ob\u0163inute \u00een urma \u00eencheierii unor protocoale secrete \u00eentre SRI \u015fi parchete\/instan\u0163e.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">APADOR-CH consider\u0103 c\u0103, pentru \u00eendreptarea nedrept\u0103\u0163ilor sau nelegalit\u0103\u0163ilor din dosarele penale, nu trebuie folosite amnistia \u015fi gra\u0163ierea, deoarece ele ac\u0163ioneaz\u0103 nediferen\u0163iat, \u201e\u00een bloc\u201d, asupra tuturor persoanelor care au comis o anumit\u0103 infrac\u0163iune, astfel c\u0103 de amnistie \u015fi gra\u0163iere vor profita \u015fi persoane care nu au fost victime ale unor abuzuri \u0219i nelegalit\u0103\u0163i.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Abuzurile trebuie remediate \u00een mod individual, \u00een cazurile individuale \u00een care au fost comise (\u015fi dovedite), iar remediile nu trebuie extinse \u015fi asupra celor care nu au fost \u201evictime ale justi\u0163iei\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">O cale pentru remedierea acestor abuzuri\/nelegalit\u0103\u0163i poate fi <strong>contesta\u0163ia \u00een anulare<\/strong> (art. 426 lit. d din Cpp) \u00eempotriva hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor definitive de condamnare pronun\u0163ate de completele de 5 judec\u0103tori constituite nelegal (exist\u0103 o decizie a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale care a constatat nelegalitatea compunerii) sau <strong>revizuirea<\/strong> hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor definitive care s-au bazat pe probe ilegale rezultate din protocoale secrete (\u00een acest din urm\u0103 caz are o deosebit\u0103 importan\u0163\u0103 decizia Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale cu privire la protocoalele secrete, care se va pronun\u0163a, probabil, maine, miercuri, 19 decembrie 2018.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Problema legat\u0103 de <strong>contesta\u0163ia \u00een anulare<\/strong>, care ar trebui rezolvat\u0103, eventual, printr-o ordonan\u0163\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103, este termenul \u00een care poate fi declarat\u0103. \u00cen prezent, termenul este limitat la 30 de zile de la data comunic\u0103rii deciziei instan\u0163ei de apel. Aceast\u0103 limitare ar trebui eliminat\u0103, pentru rezolvarea problemei creat\u0103 de nelegala compunere, timp de 4 ani (2014-2018) a completelor de 5 judec\u0103tori de la \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie. \u00cen acest sens, art. 428 al. 1 \u015fi din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 (Cpp) ar trebui modificat \u00een sensul c\u0103 \u00een cazul compunerii nelegale a instan\u0163ei contesta\u0163ia \u00een anulare poate fi introdus\u0103 <em>oric\u00e2nd<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen cazul folosirii de probe ilegale ca temei pentru condamnare, consider\u0103m c\u0103 solu\u0163ia, care nu necesit\u0103 nicio modificare legislativ\u0103, este <strong>revizuirea<\/strong> hot\u0103r\u00e2ri definitive de condamnare, \u00een baza art.\u00a0 453 al. 1 lit. a din Cpp (s-au descoperit fapte sau \u00eemprejur\u0103ri ce nu au fost cunoscute la solu\u0163ionarea cauzei \u015fi care dovedesc netemeinicia hot\u0103r\u00e2rii pronun\u0163ate \u00een cauz\u0103). Potrivit art. 457 al. 1 Cpp, cererea de revizuire \u00een favoarea condamnatului se poate face <em>oric\u00e2nd<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><div class=\"su-note\"  style=\"border-color:#c7d6d7;border-radius:2px;-moz-border-radius:2px;-webkit-border-radius:2px;\"><div class=\"su-note-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\" style=\"background-color:#e1f0f1;border-color:#ffffff;color:#333333;border-radius:2px;-moz-border-radius:2px;-webkit-border-radius:2px;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Despre amnistie \u0219i gra\u021biere<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><strong>Amnistia<\/strong> (care nu poate fi dec\u00e2t colectiv\u0103) \u015fi <strong>gra\u0163ierea colectiv\u0103<\/strong> pot fi dispuse nu doar prin lege (organic\u0103), ci \u015fi prin ordonan\u0163\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103, dac\u0103 sunt \u00eendeplinite condi\u0163iile din art. 115 al. 4 \u015fi 6 din Constitu\u0163ie pentru adoptarea ordonan\u0163elor de urgen\u0163\u0103, respectiv, dac\u0103 se justific\u0103 existen\u0163a unei situa\u0163ii de urgen\u0163\u0103 (situa\u0163ie extraordinar\u0103 a c\u0103rei reglementare nu poate fi am\u00e2nat\u0103) \u015fi dac\u0103 prin ordonan\u0163\u0103 nu sunt afectate (restr\u00e2nse, limitate) drepturile, libert\u0103\u0163ile \u015fi \u00eendatoririle prev\u0103zute de Constitu\u0163ie. Gra\u0163ierea individual\u0103 poate fi dispus\u0103 numai de pre\u015fedinte, prin decret.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Amnistia<\/strong> (\u00een greac\u0103, <em>amnestia= <\/em>uitare) \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103 r\u0103spunderea penal\u0103 pentru infrac\u0163iunea s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fit\u0103. Cu alte cuvinte, condamn\u0103rile pronun\u0163ate pentru infrac\u0163iunile amnistiate (nu pentru orice infrac\u0163iuni) nu se mai iau \u00een seam\u0103 (cazierul judiciar se \u201ealbe\u015fte\u201d), procesele aflate \u00een curs se opresc, f\u0103r\u0103 condamnare, dac\u0103 privesc infrac\u0163iuni amnistiate (se dispune, la primul termen de judecat\u0103 care urmeaz\u0103 actului de amnistie, \u00eencetarea procesului penal pe motiv c\u0103 a intervenit amnistia), iar urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 \u00een dosarele de la parchet\/poli\u0163ie pentru infrac\u0163iuni amnistiate se opre\u015fte \u00een stadiul \u00een care ajunsese la momentul actului de amnistie (dosarul se va \u201e\u00eenchide\u201d, se va da clasare, pe motiv c\u0103 a intervenit amnistia).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cel care se consider\u0103 nevinovat \u015fi a fost amnistiat (cu consecin\u0163a opririi imediate a procesului\/urm\u0103ririi penale) poate cere continuarea procesului penal sau a urm\u0103ririi penale. Procesul\/urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 vor continua \u015fi dac\u0103 cel \u00een cauz\u0103 e g\u0103sit nevinovat, se va dispune achitarea sau, dup\u0103 caz, clasarea dosarului pe motiv c\u0103 e nevinovat (nu c\u0103 e amnistiat). Dac\u0103 e g\u0103sit vinovat, tot nu va fi condamnat\/trimis \u00een judecat\u0103, ci se va da o solu\u0163ie de \u00eencetare a procesului sau, dup\u0103 caz, de clasare a dosarului, bazat\u0103 pe faptul c\u0103 e amnistiat.<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\" start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Gra\u0163ierea<\/strong> nu \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103 r\u0103spunderea penal\u0103, nu desfiin\u0163eaz\u0103 condamn\u0103rile deja existente (nu \u201e\u015fterge\u201d condamnarea din cazierul judiciar), ci doar \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103, total sau par\u0163ial, executarea pedepsei. \u00cen caz de gra\u0163iere, procesul \u015fi urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 pentru infrac\u0163iunea gra\u0163iat\u0103 vor continua, nu se vor opri, ca \u00een cazul amnistiei. Dac\u0103 exist\u0103 probe de vinov\u0103\u0163ie, persoana urm\u0103rit\u0103 penal va fi trimis\u0103 \u00een judecat\u0103, iar persoana trimis\u0103 \u00een judecat\u0103 va fi condamnat\u0103. Beneficiul celui gra\u0163iat este c\u0103 nu va executa pedeapsa ce i se va aplica de instant\u0103, \u00een caz de condamnare. Gra\u0163ierea poate fi total\u0103 (prive\u015fte \u00eentreaga pedeaps\u0103 aplicat\u0103) sau par\u0163ial\u0103 (prive\u015fte doar o cot\u0103\/frac\u0163ie din pedeapsa aplicat\u0103; restul de pedeaps\u0103, negratiat\u0103, va fi executat\u0103). Gra\u0163ierea poate fi necondi\u0163ionat\u0103 (beneficiarului nu i se cere o anumit\u0103 conduit\u0103 dup\u0103 gra\u0163iere) sau condi\u0163ionat\u0103 (de exemplu, este gra\u0163iat sub condi\u0163ia de a nu mai comite o nou\u0103 infrac\u0163iune: dac\u0103 \u00eentr-un termen de la gra\u0163iere, s\u0103 zicem 3 ani, cel gra\u0163iat s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fe\u015fte o nou\u0103 infrac\u0163iune, va executa pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 pedeapsa pentru noua infrac\u0163iune \u015fi pedeapsa care i-a fost gra\u0163iat\u0103). Gra\u0163ierea poate fi colectiv\u0103 (prive\u015fte toate persoanele care au s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fit o anume infrac\u0163iune\/anumite infrac\u0163iuni) sau individual\u0103 (prime\u015fte o singur\u0103 persoan\u0103). Doar gra\u0163ierea colectiv\u0103 se acord\u0103 prin lege (organic\u0103) sau, dup\u0103 caz, prin ordonan\u0163\u0103 de urgen\u0163\u0103 (delegare legislativ\u0103 \u00een baza art. 115 din Constitu\u0163ie). Gra\u0163ierea individual\u0103 se acord\u0103 doar de pre\u015fedinte, prin decret.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6491\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n<p>Abuzurile trebuie remediate \u00een mod individual, \u00een cazurile \u00een care au fost comise (\u015fi dovedite), iar remediile nu trebuie extinse \u015fi asupra celor care nu au fost \u201evictime ale justi\u0163iei\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":6496,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,29,81],"tags":[785,41,786,90,535,250,787],"class_list":["post-6491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-buna-guvernare","category-comunicate","category-slider","tag-amnistie","tag-apador-ch","tag-contestatie-in-anulare","tag-curtea-constitutionala","tag-gratiere","tag-ordonanta-de-urgenta","tag-revizuire"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6491\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6496"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}