{"id":8727,"date":"2017-02-10T14:03:39","date_gmt":"2017-02-10T12:03:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/?p=4016"},"modified":"2020-08-12T13:08:41","modified_gmt":"2020-08-12T11:08:41","slug":"seful-politiei-si-igpr-amendati-de-instanta-cu-350-de-leizi-pentru-refuzul-de-a-comunica-informatii-publice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/seful-politiei-si-igpr-amendati-de-instanta-cu-350-de-leizi-pentru-refuzul-de-a-comunica-informatii-publice\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0218eful poli\u021biei \u0219i IGPR, amenda\u021bi de instan\u021b\u0103 cu 350 de lei\/zi pentru refuzul de a comunica informa\u021bii publice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n[button link=&#8221;http:\/\/www.apador.org\/manualul-de-bune-practici-al-politiei\/&#8221; style=&#8221;alert&#8221; color=&#8221;red&#8221; window=&#8221;yes&#8221;]UPDATE decembrie 2017 &#8211;\u00a0Dup\u0103 doi ani de procese am ob\u021binut \u201emanualul de bune practici\u201d al poli\u021biei[\/button]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bogdan Despescu \u2013 Inspector General al Poli\u0163iei Rom\u00e2ne \u2013 a fost obligat de instan\u021b\u0103 la plata \u00a0c\u0103tre bugetul de stat a unei amenzi de 250 lei\/zi, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu data de 4.11.2016, data la care APADOR-CH a dat \u00een judecat\u0103 Poli\u021bia Rom\u00e2n\u0103 pentru c\u0103 a refuzat s\u0103 furnizeze informa\u021bii publice. \u00cen aceea\u0219i decizie pronun\u021bat\u0103 de Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti la 30 ianuarie 2016, Inspectoratul General al Poli\u0163iei Rom\u00e2ne (IGPR) este obligat s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 APADOR-CH penalit\u0103\u0163i de 100 lei\/zi \u00eent\u00e2rziere, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu aceea\u0219i dat\u0103 a introducerii ac\u021biunii \u00een instan\u021b\u0103, p\u00e2n\u0103 la momentul furniz\u0103rii informa\u021biilor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/pulan.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4023\" src=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/pulan.jpg\" alt=\"pulan\" width=\"600\" height=\"325\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aceasta este cea mai recent\u0103 decizie judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 pe care am ob\u021binut-o \u00een <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/gratis-politia-romana-obligata-de-instanta-sa-publice-procedurile-de-lucru-in-cazul-legitimarii-amprentarii-si-conducerii-la-sectie\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">procesul purtat cu IGPR de anul trecut<\/a>, de c\u00e2nd i-am cerut s\u0103 ne furnizeze informa\u021bii privind procedurile de conducere la sec\u021bie, amprentare, fotografiere \u0219i control aplicate cet\u0103\u021benilor escorta\u021bi\u00a0la sec\u021bia de poli\u021bie. Poli\u021bia a refuzat s\u0103 ne furnizeze aceste informa\u021bii, solicitate conform Legii 544\/2001, pe motiv c\u0103 popularizarea lor ar fi de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze activitatea organelor. Totu\u0219i procedurile sunt informa\u021bii publice, pe care orice cet\u0103\u021bean are dreptul s\u0103 le cunoasc\u0103, iar dovada c\u0103 motivarea IGPR invocat\u0103 \u00een proces este fals\u0103 e faptul c\u0103 aceste proceduri sunt publicate \u00eentr-un <a href=\"http:\/\/www.elefant.ro\/carti\/carti-de-specialitate\/drept-legislatie\/elemente-de-tactica-politieneasca-si-proceduri-operationale-privind-interventia-structurilor-de-ordine-si-siguranta-publica-215751.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">manual care se vinde la liber \u00een libr\u0103rii<\/a>, sub semn\u0103turile unor poli\u021bi\u0219ti.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">IGPR a fost obligat\u0103 de instan\u021b\u0103 s\u0103 fac\u0103 publice procedurile, dar \u00een loc s\u0103 se conformeze a preferat s\u0103 trimit\u0103 un r\u0103spuns alambicat, cu informa\u021bii contradictorii, ba c\u0103 ordinul ce con\u021binea procedurile ar fi fost abrogat, ba c\u0103 procedurile \u00een sine sunt specificate \u00eentr-un alt act administrativ, dar care nu se aplic\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">APADOR-CH a dat din nou \u00een judecat\u0103 IGPR \u0219i pe \u0219eful acestuia, pentru nerespectarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u0219ti, cer\u00e2nd ca inspectorul \u0219ef Bogdan Despescu \u0219i institu\u021bia pe care o conduce s\u0103 fie amendate conform legii. Instan\u021ba a decis \u0219i de aceast\u0103 dat\u0103 \u00een favoarea dreptului publicului de a fi informat, oblig\u00e2nd poli\u021bia s\u0103 respecte legea sub sanc\u021biunea financiar\u0103. Decizia nu este definitiv\u0103 \u0219i poate fi atacat\u0103 de poli\u021bie \u00een 15 zile.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dac\u0103 va r\u0103m\u00e2ne definitiv\u0103, \u0219eful IGPR\u00a0va fi obligat s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 din salariul propriu c\u0103tre\u00a0buget suma de 250 de lei x cel pu\u021bin 100 de zile (p\u00e2n\u0103 acum) c\u00e2te s-au scurs de la \u00eenceperea acestui proces. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, IGPR va achita (de data asta de la buget) c\u0103tre APADOR-CH amenda zilnic\u0103 de 100 de lei, pentru c\u0103 unul dintre func\u021bionarii s\u0103i refuz\u0103 s\u0103 respecte legea.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Oblig\u0103 p\u00e2r\u00e2tul Bogdan Despescu \u2013 Inspector General al Poli\u0163iei Rom\u00e2ne, la plata c\u0103tre bugetul de stat a unei amenzi \u00een cuantum de 250 lei\/zi, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu data de 4.11.2016, data formul\u0103rii prezentei ac\u0163iuni \u015fi p\u00e2n\u0103 la executarea integral\u0103 a dispozi\u0163iilor sentin\u0163ei civile 392\/25.01.2016 a Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti \u2013 Sec\u0163ia a II-a Contencios Administrativ \u015fi Fiscal Oblig\u0103 p\u00e2r\u00e2tul Inspectoratul General al Poli\u0163iei Rom\u00e2ne la plata c\u0103tre reclamant\u0103 a unei penalit\u0103\u0163i de 100 lei\/zi \u00eent\u00e2rziere, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu data de 4.11.2016, data formul\u0103rii prezentei ac\u0163iuni \u015fi p\u00e2n\u0103 la executarea integral\u0103 a dispozi\u0163iilor sentin\u0163ei civile 392\/25.01.2016 a Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti \u2013 Sec\u0163ia a II-a Contencios Administrativ \u015fi Fiscal Cu recurs \u00een 15 zile de la comunicare, cererea de recurs urm\u00e2nd a fi depus\u0103 la Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti \u2013 Sec\u0163ia a II-a Contencios Administrativ \u015fi Fiscal 30.01.2017 (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/comunicare-incheiere-IGPR.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">cite\u0219te textul deciziei<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[box]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Demersuri f\u0103cute \u00een acest proces:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/gratis-politia-romana-obligata-de-instanta-sa-publice-procedurile-de-lucru-in-cazul-legitimarii-amprentarii-si-conducerii-la-sectie\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Gratis! Poli\u021bia Rom\u00e2n\u0103, obligat\u0103 de instan\u021b\u0103 s\u0103 publice procedurile de lucru \u00een cazul legitim\u0103rii, amprent\u0103rii \u0219i conducerii la sec\u021bie<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/blog\/politia-romana-se-comporta-hoteste-chiar-si-in-fata-instantei-cand-i-se-cer-informatii-publice\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Poli\u021bia Rom\u00e2n\u0103 se comport\u0103 ho\u021be\u0219te chiar \u0219i \u00een fa\u021ba instan\u021bei, c\u00e2nd i se cer informa\u021bii publice<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[\/box]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IGPR a fost obligat\u0103 de instan\u021b\u0103 s\u0103 fac\u0103 publice procedurile de amprentare, fotografiere \u0219i conducere la sec\u021bie, iar pentru c\u0103 refuz\u0103 s\u0103 respecte \u0219i Legea 544\/2001,, \u0219i hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103, IGPR \u00eempreun\u0103 cu \u0219eful s\u0103u sunt amenda\u021bi cu 350 de lei\/zi de \u00eent\u00e2rziere<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":8418,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1026,1022],"tags":[956,674,1070,380,1143,395,51,187,1231,673,1252],"class_list":["post-8727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articole","category-articole-reportaje","tag-amenda","tag-amprentare","tag-bogdan-despescu","tag-conducere-la-sectie","tag-fotografiere","tag-igpr","tag-informatii-publice","tag-legea-5442001","tag-perchezitie","tag-proceduri-politie","tag-proces-igpr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8727\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}