{"id":8992,"date":"2011-08-20T13:59:01","date_gmt":"2011-08-20T11:59:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta.apador.org\/?p=8992"},"modified":"2020-08-20T14:19:34","modified_gmt":"2020-08-20T12:19:34","slug":"jurisprudenta-cedo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/jurisprudenta-cedo\/","title":{"rendered":"Jurispruden\u0163a CEDO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8992\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><div id=\"title-container\">\n<h1 class=\"title col-full\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"content\" class=\"page col-full\">\n<div id=\"main\" class=\"fullwidth\">\n<div class=\"post-92 page type-page status-publish hentry\">\n<div class=\"entry\">\n<div id=\"tabs-79\" class=\"shortcode-tabs vertical\">\n<ul class=\"tab_titles\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li class=\"nav-tab\">GUZZARDI \u00ceMPOTRIVA ITALIEI, 06\/11\/1980<\/li>\n<li class=\"nav-tab\">MOGO\u015e \u00ceMPOTRIVA ROM\u00c2NIEI, 06\/05\/2004<\/li>\n<li class=\"nav-tab\">CREANG\u0102 \u00ceMPOTRIVA ROM\u00c2NIEI, 15\/6\/2010<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"tab tab-guzzardi-impotriva-italiei-06-11-1980\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Guzzardi \u00eempotriva Italiei, 6\/11\/1980<\/strong>Stare de fapt: reclamant consemnat la \u015federe pe o insul\u0103 \u015fi nu de\u0163inut \u00eentr-un loc \u00eenchis, dar care dispunea de un spa\u0163iu limitat, se g\u0103sea sub o supraveghere strict\u0103 din partea agen\u0163ilor statului \u015fi nu putea avea dec\u00e2t contacte foarte reduse cu persoanele de pe insul\u0103 sau cu familia.<br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\nAnaliza Cur\u0163ii Europene<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"woo-sc-quote\">\n<p>92. Curtea reaminte\u015fte c\u0103 proclam\u00e2nd \u201edreptul la libertate\u201d, paragraful 1 al articolului 5 vizeaz\u0103 libertatea fizic\u0103 a persoanei; el are ca scop s\u0103 asigure c\u0103 nimeni nu este lipsit de libertate \u00een mod arbitrar \u2026 Pentru a stabili dac\u0103 o persoan\u0103 este \u201elipsit\u0103 de libertate\u201d \u00een sensul articolului 5, trebuie s\u0103 se plece de la situa\u0163ia sa concret\u0103 \u015fi s\u0103 se ia \u00een considerare un ansamblu de criterii cum ar fi genul, durata, efectele \u015fi modalit\u0103\u0163ile de executare a m\u0103surii \u00een cauz\u0103 (hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Engel \u015fi al\u0163ii din 8 iunie1976, Seria A nr. 22, p. 24, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>Concluzia: reclamantul a fost privat de libertate<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"tab tab-mogos-impotriva-romaniei-06-05-2004\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Mogo\u015f \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei, 06\/5\/2004<\/strong>Stare de fapt: reclaman\u0163i apatrizi, de origine rom\u00e2n\u0103 care a f\u0103cut obiectul unei return\u0103ri pe teritoriul Rom\u00e2niei \u00een baza unei conven\u0163ii bilaterale cu Germania. Datorit\u0103 refuzului lor de a intra pe teritoriul Rom\u00e2niei, reclaman\u0163ii au fost interna\u0163i la Centrul de tranzit de la Otopeni \u00een vederea clarific\u0103rii situa\u0163iei lor juridice.<br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\nAnaliza Cur\u0163ii Europene<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"woo-sc-quote\">\n<p>Curtea observ\u0103 c\u0103 problema care se pune este aceea a exercit\u0103rii op\u0163iunii de a intra pe teritoriul rom\u00e2n \u015fi de a p\u0103r\u0103si centru de tranzit. Ea ia act de pozi\u0163ia ferm\u0103 a reclaman\u0163ilor \u00een aceast\u0103 privin\u0163\u0103: ei refuz\u0103 s\u0103 intre pe teritoriul rom\u00e2n sau s\u0103 aib\u0103 raporturi juridice cu statul rom\u00e2n. Curtea observ\u0103 c\u0103 reclaman\u0163ii nu sunt nici aresta\u0163i nici de\u0163inu\u0163i de autorit\u0103\u0163ile rom\u00e2ne, neexist\u00e2nd vreo decizie judiciar\u0103 \u00een acest sens. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere posibilitatea reclaman\u0163ilor de a p\u0103r\u0103si centrul de tranzit \u00een orice moment \u015fi refuzul lor de a folosi aceast\u0103 posibilitate, Curtea apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 situa\u0163ia astfel creat\u0103 nu este imputabil\u0103 statului p\u00e2r\u00e2t.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>Concluzia: reclaman\u0163ii nu au fost priva\u0163i de libertate<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"tab tab-creanga-impotriva-romaniei-15-6-2010\">\n<p><strong>Creang\u0103 \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei, 15\/6\/2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Situa\u0163ia de fapt: \u00een octombrie 2003, reclamantul a fost re\u0163inut timp de 11 ore la sediul PNA (de la orele 9:00 la orele 20:00) pentru audieri \u015fi ulterior arestat preventiv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Analiza Cur\u0163ii Europene<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"woo-sc-quote\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p>45. Sensibil\u0103 la vulnerabilitatea special\u0103 a persoanelor care se afl\u0103 sub controlul exclusiv al agen\u0163ilor statului, Curtea reaminte\u015fte c\u0103 procedura prev\u0103zut\u0103 de Conven\u0163ie nu se preteaz\u0103 \u00eentotdeauna la o aplicare riguroas\u0103 a principiului affirmanti incumbit probatio (cel care afirm\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 fac\u0103 proba) (mutatis mutandis, Khoudoyorov c. Rusiei, no\u00a06847\/02, \u00a7\u00a0113, CEDH 2005-X (extrase)). \u00centr-adev\u0103r, atunci c\u00e2nd o persoan\u0103 acuz\u0103 agen\u0163ilor statului c\u0103 au violat drepturile care \u00eei sunt garantate de Comven\u0163ie, proba poate rezulta dintr-un m\u0103nunchi de indicii sau de prezum\u0163ii irefragabile, suficient de grave, precise \u015fi concordante(mutatis mutandis, Salman c. Turciei [MC], no 21986\/93, \u00a7\u00a0100, CEDH 2000-VII).<br \/>\n46. Curtea observ\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 nu este contestat c\u0103 reclamantul s-a prezentat la sediul parchetului pe 16 iulie 2003 \u015fi c\u0103 a f\u0103cut declara\u0163ii la orele 10 \u015fi ulterior 20. Curtea observ\u0103 c\u0103 dac\u0103 prima declara\u0163ie nu men\u0163ioneaz\u0103 dac\u0103 reclamantul a fost audiat \u00een calitate de persoan\u0103 urm\u0103rit\u0103 penal, la cea de-a doua declara\u0163ie a fost informat c\u0103 era b\u0103nuit de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea mai multor infrac\u0163iuni.<br \/>\n47. Curtea observ\u0103 c\u0103 Guvernul nu a furnizat informa\u0163ii concrete privind atitudinea autorit\u0103\u0163ilor cu privire la situa\u0163ia reclamantului \u00een timpul zilei de 16 iulie 2003. Astfel, nu au fost furnizate Cur\u0163ii nici informa\u0163ii privind faptul dac\u0103 reclamantul ar fi p\u0103r\u0103sit sediul parchetului, de exemplu prin consemnarea informa\u0163iilor cu privire la persoanele care intr\u0103 sau ies din sediul institu\u0163iei \u015fi nici demersurile f\u0103cute de autorit\u0103\u0163i pentru a-l informa cu privire la posibilitatea de a p\u0103r\u0103si sediul parchetului.<br \/>\n48. Curtea mai arat\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een timpul zilei de 16 iulie 2003, parchetul a declan\u015fat urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 \u015fi c\u0103, \u00een timpul serii, a cerut arestarea sa preventiv\u0103. Derularea evenimentelor din cursul zilei, a\u015fa cum rezult\u0103 din dosar \u2013 interogatoriu, urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, un al doilea interogatoriu \u00een calitate de inculpat, arestare preventiv\u0103 \u2013 permite concluzia c\u0103 reclamantul a r\u0103mas toat\u0103 ziua la sediul parchetului \u015fi c\u0103 nu a fost liber s\u0103-l p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Concluzia: reclamantul a fost privat de libertate. La cererea Guvernului, cauza a fost retrimis\u0103 \u00een fa\u0163a Marii Camere formate din 17 judec\u0103tori. Marea Camer\u0103 a men\u021binut\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.apador.org\/show_report_nf.php?id=240\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">solu\u021bia in\u021bial\u0103<\/a>\u00a0pe 23 feb 2012<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/scoateti-legea-din-duba\/\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-soft su-button-wide\" style=\"color:#324645;background-color:#ec2800;border-color:#bd2000;border-radius:7px\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" title=\"bla\"><span style=\"color:#324645;padding:7px 20px;font-size:16px;line-height:24px;border-color:#f2694d;border-radius:7px;text-shadow:none\"><i class=\"sui sui-hand-o-right\" style=\"font-size:16px;color:#FFFFFF\"><\/i> Acest articol face parte din proiectul Scoate\u021bi legea din dub\u0103, derulat de APADOR-CH \u00een 2011<\/span><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/apador.org\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8992\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-ro\" title=\"Rom\u00e2n\u0103\">Rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n<p>Jurispruden\u0163a Cur\u0163ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[1322],"class_list":["post-8992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finalizate","tag-cazuri-cedo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8992\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/apador.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}