Organizațiile semnatare ale acestei poziții îsi exprimă consternarea în legătură cu demersurile parlamentare recente de revizuire a Constituției României, prin care se doreste renunțarea la asigurarea protecției constituționale împotriva discriminării, prin excluderea unor criterii, precum orientarea sexuală, vârsta sau dizabilitatea.
The Grand Chamber of 17 judges of the European Court of Human Rights set that the public hearing in the case Anca Mocanu and others v. Romania (the file on the 13-15 June 1990 events in Bucharest) is to take place on 2 October 2013.
APADOR-CH anunţă scoaterea la concurs a postului de director executiv al asociaţiei
Prin Hotărârea Parlamentului nr. 17/2013 a fost constituită Comisia comună a Camerei Deputaţilor şi Senatului pentru elaborarea propunerii legislative de revizuire a Constituţiei României.
On April 19, 2013, two representatives of APADOR-CH went to the General Police Direction custody facility to check information about the physical and mental state of detainee Ninel Viorel Onţică, a former drug addict who had been under methadone treatment for more than 10 years
The representatives of the Association noted once again that police custody facilities use procedures that go against the law, more precisely they are in breech of Law no. 275/2006 on the execution of sentences and other measures decided by the judiciary bodies during the criminal trial. Thus, at the Center for Preventive Arrest and Detention (CPAD) in Mehedinţi, the rules are still those set by Order no. 988/2005 approving the Regulations for the organization and functioning of preventive arrest and detention facilities attached to police units. As a consequence detainees, including women or minors, are handcuffed every time they leave the facility (as a rule, not an exceptional measure). APADOR-CH asks again that the practice of automatically handcuffing detainees should be dismissed.
Două reprezentante ale APADOR-CH au vizitat sediul central al Penitenciarului Drobeta Turnu-Severin și secția exterioară Vânjuleț, situată la proximativ 30 de kilometri de oraș
We are writing to you in order to reiterate our readiness to co-operate for the improvement of the Romanian Constitution and, at the same time, to express our concern with the flaws of the public consultation process regarding a piece of legislation that is of vital importance for the future of the country.
The signatory organizations ask for Article II of the Legislative proposal to modify Government Ordinance no. 26/2000 on associations and foundations to be eliminated from the document, as voted by the Senate on February 12, 2013. Maintaining Article II is in violation of the general principle of irretroactivity of the law (provided by Article 15, paragraph 2 of the Constitution), the principle of separation of powers (Article 1, paragraph 4 of the Constitution) and of the authority of res judicata of final and irrevocable court decisions , as well as of the right to freedom of association (guaranteed by Article 40, paragraph 1 of the Constitution).
Request for referral to the Grand Chamber pursuant to article 43 of the Convention and rule 73 of the rules of Court